|
| | |
Spontaneous Sierpinski Triangle Funcompo |
Event Type :
Standalone Compo
Dates :
19 March - 30 April 2016
Organizers :
Didi
Competition Results :
C64 Demo
C64 Graphics
C64 Basic Demo
Mixed
C64 256b Intro
Productions released outside compos :
Attendants : (16)
Bitbreaker, ChristopherJam, Enthusi, Freshness, Graham, Krill, Lft, Mixer, Monte Carlos, Rudi, Skate, Smasher, Snabel, TheRyk, Volcano, White Flame
Releases containing information on this event :
User Comment
Submitted by TheRyk on 7 June 2016
User Comment
Submitted by Krill on 27 April 2016
| Hmm, when is the exact deadline? April 30 23:59 UTC? :) |
User Comment
Submitted by Smasher on 26 April 2016
#Ze Smasher added Linus in his ignore-list.
:) |
User Comment
Submitted by Linus on 26 April 2016
| Since the end of april is nigh ... how about a sequel? :D |
User Comment
Submitted by Didi on 11 April 2016
| Finally a compo where the hardcore coders can scuff their teeth. :D |
User Comment
Submitted by Mixer on 9 April 2016
| Sorry about flooding the compo, but its just that after submitting one version new optimizations were suggested. |
User Comment
Submitted by Pex Mahoney Tufvesson on 31 March 2016
BTW. I found a 1995-ish-implementation of the Sierpinski triangle in the demo Xmas Pack by Pajda of Faith Design...
Xmas Pack
...press "H" for the Hangman Preview. |
User Comment
Submitted by White Flame on 29 March 2016
| Should we split out the BASIC vs ML entries? I did with mine, but am not going to edit others' without discussion. |
User Comment
Submitted by Skate on 28 March 2016
| @Cruzer: We missed you pal. I feel both lucky & unlucky that you've missed this compo. :D There is still a few days to go though. |
User Comment
Submitted by Cruzer on 28 March 2016
| Wasn't even aware of this compo since I'm in coding hiatus, but great to see all the crazy creativity going on! |
User Comment
Submitted by Skate on 27 March 2016
User Comment
Submitted by Shine on 25 March 2016
| This is one of the reasons why i like this place! Competitions show many times very creative stuff!!! :) |
User Comment
Submitted by Smasher on 25 March 2016
User Comment
Submitted by White Flame on 25 March 2016
| Thanks, not-quite-BBCode! Anyway, /\ etc. |
User Comment
Submitted by Smasher on 24 March 2016
User Comment
Submitted by ChristopherJam on 24 March 2016
Quote:CSDb is no compo platform.
Whether it's become so by default or not, custom categories would still be useful for reporting purposes. Still, I can well understand why it would be a pretty low priority. |
User Comment
Submitted by Krill on 23 March 2016
User Comment
Submitted by Didi on 23 March 2016
CSDb is no compo platform.
Otherwise it is just a matter of definition. Maybe put smaller ones into the C64 Demo compo category then. |
User Comment
Submitted by ChristopherJam on 23 March 2016
| It's a shame csdb doesn't support multiple compos for an event beyond the usual generic categories, otherwise we could have separate lists above for "single hires Sierpinski Triangle at least 128 pixels wide" vs everything else. |
User Comment
Submitted by Smasher on 22 March 2016
/\
/\/\
/\ /\
/\/\/\/\
/\ /\
/\/\ /\/\
/\ /\ /\ /\
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
/\ /\
/\/\ /\/\
/\ /\ /\ /\
/\/\/\/\ /\/\/\/\
/\ /\ /\ /\
/\/\ /\/\ /\/\ /\/\
/\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
|
User Comment
Submitted by ChristopherJam on 22 March 2016
| Ok, ninedotski was silly, but charmodeski's semiserious, albeit coded in the shower and uploaded ten minutes later without any optimisation. Still bending the implicit rules to breaking point, but at least the output is sensible.. |
User Comment
Submitted by ChristopherJam on 22 March 2016
User Comment
Submitted by Didi on 22 March 2016
| I am always astonished how people interpret rules, even if there are none. :D |
User Comment
Submitted by Didi on 22 March 2016
| Thought more about codesize. ;) |
User Comment
Submitted by ChristopherJam on 22 March 2016
| Did someone say no dimensions? |
User Comment
Submitted by Didi on 22 March 2016
| Nah, no rules. Just fun. Nothing to win. Try to beat each other in size. |
User Comment
Submitted by Bitbreaker on 22 March 2016
| What? Rules? I did not see any rules :-D |
User Comment
Submitted by Jammer on 22 March 2016
| And what about dimensions? ;) Volcano and Skate employ proper ratio/angles for that figure :D |
User Comment
Submitted by Jammer on 22 March 2016
| What are the rules then? Are participants supposed to follow fractal routine or result is just supposed to look like Sierpiński's pattern? ;) |
User Comment
Submitted by bugjam on 22 March 2016
|
|
|
 | Search CSDb |
|
| Navigate | |
|
| Detailed Info | |
|
| Sort Releases | |
|
| Forum | |
|
| Support CSDb | |
|
 |  |
|
