Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user maak ! (Registered 2024-04-18) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Entries > Release id #13290 : Geometric 2 +4F
2006-12-15 07:32
Mace

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799
Release id #13290 : Geometric 2 +4F

Isn't it a bit odd to have a D64 with all cracks from a certain group?
I mean... it's supposed to be single entries, right?
2006-12-15 08:03
cba

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 932
Quote: Isn't it a bit odd to have a D64 with all cracks from a certain group?
I mean... it's supposed to be single entries, right?


I can only agree, but ppl are just to lazy to split them
up into single .t64/.d64 files.

2006-12-15 09:14
Twoflower

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 434
This question about separating is a lose-lose situation. I often find it interesting to know the context of a release, f.ex spreadnotes, headers, releases spread at the same time. You don't get that with a separated release. This wasn't really an issue on the boards, but when it comes to mailreleases you get a different picture. With notes and headers you could sometimes trace the spreads in detail.

Keeping disks intact has amongst other things lead me to understand why some pretty obscure versions of certain games are found in a great extent in Sweden (swappers->Xakk->Pirat-Jan). On the other hand - things get confusing in a database this way. But mind, save for the big disk-transfer collections out there, there is no good archive for spreaddisks/swapdisks.
2006-12-15 12:07
TWR
Account closed

Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 187
I always leave notes and so on at the disk if there are any.
Fixed a couple of DN cracks, enjoy.
2006-12-15 13:24
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11100
i also usually don't rip images apart, for the same reasons twoflower mentioned.
2006-12-16 13:36
Tao

Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 115
I find that ripping the image apart but leaving the release-note in all different copies of the image works best (and of course preserving the headers, etc). But it's a matter of taste, I guess.
2006-12-16 16:57
Mace

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799
Would be cool to be able to make 'soft' images: built up from the separate releases in the database, but not as a real D64 (or whatever image).

You could do that by making it possible to add a database entry of a directory that holds the lay out, but links to the separate releases.
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Linus/MSL
Grue/Extend
zscs
Magic/Nah-Kolor
Guests online: 71
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.8)
2 Mojo  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
6 No Bounds  (9.6)
7 Uncensored  (9.6)
8 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
9 The Ghost  (9.6)
10 Bromance  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.9)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.7)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.5)
5 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
6 Wafer Demo  (9.5)
7 TRSAC, Gabber & Pebe..  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 Quadrants  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Oxyron  (9.3)
2 Nostalgia  (9.3)
3 Booze Design  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Crest  (9.3)
Top Original Suppliers
1 Derbyshire Ram  (9.5)
2 Black Beard  (9.4)
3 hedning  (9.2)
4 Baracuda  (9.1)
5 Irata  (8.5)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.037 sec.