Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in 
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Entries > Release id #102672 : Star Battle +D
2011-11-11 17:14
Zyron

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2033
Release id #102672 : Star Battle +D

Submitted by Zyron [PM] on 11 November 2011
Rekrul did not supply me this game. Period.

If you feel an urge to continue the discussion on who to credit for what and where please start a topic in the forum.
Thanks.



Submitted by Sixx/G¤P [PM] on 11 November 2011
The fact is that this was indeed taken from a forum, like 100+ releases before. The facts still remains that that dosn't make the forum poster the original supplier, that's just not how it works. If he supplied it to a group he would ofcoure had got credits for the supply. Now move on to the next release you could moan over, and stop using "lol" all the time, you look like some bitching teen girl.



Submitted by STE'86 [PM] on 11 November 2011
WOW! so a game no one had ever heard of till last week was uploaded last week, still protected, to Lemon. was cracked the same day by Pete. and appears 2 days later cracked by you guys. and neither the original by uploaded by Rekrul OR the crack by Pete was used at all. Thats some spooky coincidence.
@Sixx... YES IT FCKING DOES!



Submitted by JCB [PM] on 11 November 2011
I'll lol as much as I like because you're funny as fuck and I seriously am laughing my ass off at some of these posts.

You start bitching about people just questioning a credit, then you turn into a juvenile and start the moan team attacks, when that doesn't work you bring up CNET, something nobody has mentioned for a loooong time. Now it's every second post has us ruining it? So childish attacks, over-exaggeration, what next? oh yeah, personal "bitching teen girl" And you expect us to take you seriously or have a sensible discussion (something I've been trying to do on Lemon)
 
... 34 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2011-11-12 11:28
STE'86

Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 270
well you say csdb requires credits. so lets have the right ones. thats it...

in essence.
2011-11-12 11:37
Groepaz

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 8043
but it IS the right one. "original supplier" in this context means "the guy who gave the original to the cracker". no more no less. it doesnt matter who put it on the store shelve or who bought it or who uploaded it. never did, never will. Just like it doesnt matter who created the original image that someone used as a source for his c64 picture.
2011-11-12 12:03
STE'86

Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 270
not when the supplier in question specifically transfers from disk and uploads it to a scene hangout with the thread title which basically says "crack me" with an invitation to all cracking groups to do so.

thats not a passive upload. thats an active scene supply. hence...
ORIGINAL SUPPLIER

now show me in your "scene" rules where this doesnt apply!
2011-11-12 12:06
Groepaz

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 8043
you totally have an idea how the cracking scene works, indeed.
2011-11-12 12:17
STE'86

Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 270
come on. trawl your cracking rules and show me how Rekrul didnt actively supply an original to the cracking scene.
2011-11-12 12:21
Groepaz

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 8043
it doesnt matter, he didnt supply it to the cracker.
2011-11-12 12:28
Zyron

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2033
C'mon STE, it's been said many times already. You should know this by now.
2011-11-12 13:41
TheRyk

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 379
On the one hand, claiming supply credz for stuff which is online might be a silly thing, so why not simply remove the credit? The world won't stop turning, neither will someone think worse of hedning. On the other hand, downvoting a crack for such unimportant reasons seems just as silly to me.

The only thing I learned here this year is that any arguing/justifying just fuels the fire. The whole discussion is just one more example of why CSDb deserves its reputation of an uberleet drama queen kindergarten. I don't care very much anymore, though, since I think we just have to accept that some people like playing scene cops and enjoy the resulting shitstorms.
2011-11-12 14:10
STE'86

Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 270
all i KNOW zyron. is that somebody other than Hedning supplied that for ALL the crackers to have a go at.

you can't get a much more straightforward statement than what he posted.

and claiming "that's the way it works" and "those are the rules, but i can't show you them" changes that not one iota
2011-11-12 14:17
Groepaz

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 8043
i will close this thread now. the point has been made. continue the crap at lemon if you must.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
algorithm
Groepaz/Hitmen
wacek/arise
Tomse
Jammer/TooMany
Didi/Laxity
Xenox/Alpha Flight 1..
grennouille
Jazzcat/Onslaught
Guests online: 52
Top Demos
1 Uncensored  (9.7)
2 Edge of Disgrace  (9.7)
3 ES1RA  (9.6)
4 The Shores of Reflec..  (9.6)
5 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
6 Lunatico  (9.6)
7 Comaland 100%  (9.5)
8 Incoherent Nightmare  (9.5)
9 Wonderland XII  (9.5)
10 Comaland  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
2 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
3 Treu Love [reu]  (9.4)
4 Dawnfall  (9.3)
5 SidRok  (9.3)
6 Achtung 5 Years Mayd..  (9.3)
7 One-Der  (9.2)
8 Tunnel Vision  (9.2)
9 Globe 2016 [reu]  (9.1)
10 Safe VSP  (9.1)
Top Groups
1 Booze Design  (9.4)
2 Oxyron  (9.4)
3 Censor Design  (9.4)
4 Crest  (9.3)
5 Arsenic  (9.3)
Top NTSC-Fixers
1 Pudwerx  (9.8)
2 Horizon  (9.7)
3 Stormbringer  (9.6)
4 Fungus  (9.6)
5 Booze  (9.5)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2017
Page generated in: 1.125 sec.