Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in 
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > WinVice 3.1 speed/performance on Ultrabooks?
2017-05-12 11:29
dano

Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 112
WinVice 3.1 speed/performance on Ultrabooks?

Currently i am coding on an Asus UX32VD Ultrabook (which should have some like an Intel Core i7-3517U 1.9 GHz in it). As of WinVice3.1 using x64 with FastSid does not work correctly anymore. Visuals yes, but Sound sometimes totally goes south (no filters and such).

From the Vice people i was told to use ReSid as FastSid is not supported anymore.

Now my problems start: With using ReSid WinVice drops to like 24fps on my system. Using x64sc with Resid gives me like 8fps.

Looking at procmon it seems like one core is maxed out as CPU load never goes over 24% (the graphs show a different picture as none seems to be properly used).

My workhorse laptop at the office can run x64+resid nicely and properly, but okay it got way more power than my ultrabook will have.

Somehow i got the feeling that my system (Win10 Creators) is not really working properly anymore.

That's why i am asking here.. Any of you guys got a laptop compareable to mine and how's WinVice working on your system? Or what are the general performance reports for WinVice3.1?

Before i go into the ordeal of doing a complete re-install i would like to hear what other experience with WinVice currently. If it's problem on my side, or if it's just how well WinVice works on lower spec (sort of) laptops..
 
... 51 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2017-05-16 02:06
Groepaz

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 8271
you can wait forever for "warp speed optimizations" because that will never happen. what will be optimized is accuracy of the emulation. no idea why you would prefer crappy emulation either =)

the difference you see might be because of the SID emulation settings, which have been changed to be more accurate too. (and I/O being busy is not connected to warp speed at all - except perhaps that more accurate emulation needs more CPU)
2017-05-16 02:15
Pantaloon

Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 117
I guess i stay with 2.4 forevvaaaa!
2017-05-16 02:16
Groepaz

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 8271
guess you dont need accurate CIA emulation or VIC timing for scrolling bitmaps and/or color cycling :)
2017-05-16 02:17
Pantaloon

Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 117
you guess to much.
2017-05-16 02:18
Groepaz

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 8271
anyone who prefers warp speed over accurate emulation certainly doesnt hit the limits. at all :)
2017-05-16 02:21
Pantaloon

Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 117
oh come on, just fix the damn warpspeed instead of trolling about vice settings.
2017-05-16 02:23
Groepaz

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 8271
there is nothing to fix, except for emulation bugs.
2017-05-16 07:35
soci

Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 375
I still can get 311% warp on my faster Pentium II-400 while running my recently released scroller part.

What I've noticed is that resampling is still active while in warp mode. This is sort of counter intuitive as one might think that the sound is off as there's nothing audible. Actually it isn't and it's eating cycles as usual, and much more since 3.x changed resampling defaults.

Turn off sound for real or tune back resampling to "fast". Then likely you'll get much better performance for testing stuff in warp.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Salvo Bee
nameless
pievspie
bugjam
Guests online: 36
Top Demos
1 Uncensored  (9.7)
2 Edge of Disgrace  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
4 The Shores of Reflec..  (9.6)
5 Lunatico  (9.6)
6 Comaland 100%  (9.5)
7 Incoherent Nightmare  (9.5)
8 Wonderland XII  (9.5)
9 Comaland  (9.5)
10 Wonderland XIII  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 FMX Music Demo  (9.6)
2 Pandemoniac Part 2 o..  (9.6)
3 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
4 Synthesis  (9.5)
5 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
6 Dawnfall  (9.4)
7 Treu Love [reu]  (9.4)
8 Field Sort  (9.4)
9 Pro Memoria 4  (9.3)
10 KAOS 64  (9.3)
Top Groups
1 Oxyron  (9.4)
2 Booze Design  (9.4)
3 Censor Design  (9.3)
4 Crest  (9.3)
5 The Judges  (9.3)
Top Musicians
1 Rob Hubbard  (9.7)
2 Jeroen Tel  (9.7)
3 Drax  (9.6)
4 LMan  (9.5)
5 Linus  (9.5)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2017
Page generated in: 0.409 sec.