| |
Smasher
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 512 |
Release id #149560 : fREUd [reu]
REU demos... great stuff, but: those should belong to their own category, not just [reu] tagged.
release types like "superCPU", "DTV", "IDE64" exist, why no "C64 REU demo" ? |
|
| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4595 |
It was requested before, and I believe it's in the pipeline. Don't hold your breath, though. I will poke Perff. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11108 |
didnt we invent those "supported hardware" flags for this, so we can delete those additional release type instead of adding more?
oh well :=) |
| |
Tao
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 115 |
Quoting Groepazdidnt we invent those "supported hardware" flags for this, so we can delete those additional release type instead of adding more?
oh well :=)
Supported hardware wouldn't really be the correct thing here though. You'd need "Required hardware", I think.
For instance, having [REU] or [IDE64] listed for a crack usually doesn't mean that you're *required* to have that hardware, only that the software supports using it (tagged such either because other versions don't, or because extra features are provided with such hardware).
Hmmm, come to think of it, maybe I should tag C*Base with the various hardware it supports :) |
| |
BHF
Account closed
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 30 |
Also one REU category wont be enough imho.
"C64 REU demo" & "C64 REU onefile demo"
What about REU demos that require mounting of REU images that is bigger than the orginal REU hardware ? ref. 16 MB
;) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11108 |
Quote:Supported hardware wouldn't really be the correct thing here though. You'd need "Required hardware", I think.
doh - that SO needs seperate tags. REALLY! |
