| |
grennouille
Registered: Jul 2008
Posts: 222 |
Release id #98134 : Rippy #2
Got a CPU Jam in Vice at about 60 seconds after the music begins to play. It's supposed to be the non bugged version. Anyone got the same error? And on a real 64? |
|
| |
grennouille
Registered: Jul 2008
Posts: 222 |
Nobody really cares as I can see... |
| |
The Shadow
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 304 |
Yep a jam in VICE at $85BA |
| |
Powerslave
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 24 |
As I'm the coder of this very advanced piece of code I had to test also. It seems like something goes wrong in the music player... What I can remember this is working on a real C64 (or C128 to be more exact) I have only tested this in VICE (version 2.2 and 2.3)
But anyway, GRENNOUILLE, you're probably the only one waiting 60 seconds in this demo! |
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3132 |
http://csdb.dk/release/?id=98134&show=goof#goof
no, it couldn't possibly "work" on real c64, even zeroing the memory at $c000 it would at least stop playing music or playing it wrong. It works until the scroller wraps one time, ok, but if one wanted to hear the music for longer it would have been noticed even back then =) |
| |
Powerslave
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 24 |
Changed to the working version from Ian Coog. |
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3132 |
Quote: Changed to the working version from Ian Coog.
no, don't. It's history revisionism. |
| |
The Shadow
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 304 |
Ian Coog is right. The original demo was created with a bug. As imperfect as the bug is, that is how the demo was originally created. To change the demo changes historical accuracy. |
| |
Powerslave
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 24 |
Ok, you're right...
The demo is so lousy so nobody will watch it for 60 seconds anyway! :-) |
