[CSDb] - User Forums - Does Interlace really suck ?

Welcome to our latest new user lotus_skylight ! (Registered 2024-09-25)

You are not logged in - nap

CSDb User Forums

Forums > C64 Pixeling > Does Interlace really suck ?

2006-05-03 18:32

Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5076

Does Interlace really suck ?

Back in 96 IFLI was all the hype, nobody really cared about the flickering if the picture was pixeled with a good technique.

Back in 96 Multicolor sized pixels were considered nice and not blocky, hires wasnt so overhyped.

and I think the shifting viewpoint to a great extent boils down to the wide used emulators. Everyone uses emulators today, and yes, interlace looks like shit in them, and multicolor pixels looks like huge square blocks in them.

Everyone should take some time and check the best laced pictures on a real thing with a real TV, and check multicolor / hires difference. I remember back in the time thinking that hires is actually to HIGH resolution, as a normal TV can hardly display such a pixels.

The lesson is: Interlace is only a flickering nightmare if not watched on TV, and multicolor pix has ugly big pixels only if not watched on a TV.

... 80 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....

2006-05-16 11:40

Graham
Account closed

Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 990

Quote: Those Speccy pics are really amazing. Hard to believe there's only 2 colors/char.

Not only that, but those 2 colors per char have to be at the same brightness. They can't put light blue/dark blue in the same color cell. That's why they always contrast to black: light black = dark black :)

Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 - Next

Refresh

Subscribe to this thread: