| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 110 |
vice 3.6.1 debug borders workaround
in vice 3.6.1 autostart doesn't seem to work with -VICIIborder 2. any workarounds for that? |
|
... 3 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 110 |
x64 -VICIIborder 2 demo.d64 |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11108 |
but what is the problem? typing that command? |
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 110 |
it shows full border but doesn't autostart the .d64, just sticks in basic with disk image mounted. reproes with all .d64/.prg files i've tried. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11108 |
LOL it actually works with x64sc, but not with x64
so there is the solution, and what you should do anyway: use x64sc |
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 110 |
I want faster warp and not burn my laptop. The accuracy of x64 is pretty adequate for lots of situations, just have to remember to try with real c64/x64sc once in a while.
I'm happy it can be still enabled from the build settings. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11108 |
I would'nt trust it these days - its basically untested for almost a decade and receives no fixes anymore. |
| |
Raistlin
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 552 |
Why does x64 still exist if unsupported for 10 years? Surely makes sense to remove it and tidy the codebase..? Unless there’s something it does that X64SC doesn’t? (Or does more slowly?) |
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 110 |
idk. I still used vice 2.4 x64 until a month or so ago, and didn't really have any problems with it. Everything I programmed with it worked flawlessly (or had similar bugs) on a real C=. Of course it would be nice to use more accurate emulator to be sure, but the speed difference between x64/x64sc is real, and that matters too.
I'd say the program seems finished if anything :p |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11108 |
Quote:Why does x64 still exist
Because of retroarch and raspi setups. Once those things are powerful enough to run x64sc perfectly it will get wiped from the codebase.
That said, it is not build by default and not included in the binary releases for a long time now. If you choose to build it yourself and enable x64 it's entirely your fault :) |
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 110 |
well it's still a bug in the software. but yeah just using sc is a good workaround. :D thanks |
| Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |
