Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user LoWLiFe ! (Registered 2020-09-17) You are not logged in 
CSDb User Forums

Forums > CSDb Entries > Release id #195026 : The Three Stooges' Revenge +D
2020-08-26 21:29

Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 389
Release id #195026 : The Three Stooges' Revenge +D

I am not sure if these "imports" which only have a directory tag really deserve a separate entry.
2020-08-26 21:32

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 9532
Yeah, it's almost like linking your intro infront of something you downloaded from github.
2020-08-26 22:48

Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 389
2020-08-27 01:15
Radd Maxx

Registered: Mar 2018
Posts: 44
Yeah I go back and forth on this myself. I try to be clinical about this sort of thing and tell myself it's not about what "deserves" to be in the Db even if it seems low-effort. This import, for example, is clear and understandable what it is supposed to be and who did it so it gets filed even though personally I think it only barely qualifies as collector material. I would definitely rather see an intro but I try not to make it about me. Seems like this was a real group with real members and a real BBS network and so forth, and these low-effort imports do tell their story, bare bones as it is.

Now, if it's just a file name tag (like the PAPERBOY!/KOF file I've been seeing since 87) then that just feels too vague and I ignore those. If it were multiple directory lines with "IMPORTED BY SO AND SO OF KNIGHTS OF FORTUNE, CALL OUR HQ", etc. then I'd feel a lot better about accepting it as what it purports to be.
2020-08-27 09:28
Count Zero

Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 1133
erm - NO!

Adding dir lines is easier than renaming the file given the right DirMaster setup.
Please remove and don't upload such "releases". They simply don't add value over the original "crack".

Which in this case looks weird as well - is this just an unprotected original?

PS: Another example: some Basic program printing "imported by ruckeljuckel" and loading something else then doesn't deserve an entry with "import" tag either.
2020-08-27 12:25

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 9532
Don't diss ruckeljuckel!
2020-08-27 14:12
Radd Maxx

Registered: Mar 2018
Posts: 44
>Which in this case looks weird as well - is this just an unprotected original?

There's a few other releases of this on here and they're all designated as imports. Ikari's specifically says it was "cracked in the US". But no, it is not cracked. It's definitely a homebrew game and would never have been published as it contains elements from several commercial games. Aside from Stooges there's GI Joe and Beach Head, off the top of my head.

There's a doc file that floats around with the game that credits "Bansai Labs" and "Indy-Ware" for development.
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Users Online
Harry Potthead
Guests online: 38
Top Demos
1 Uncensored  (9.7)
2 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
3 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
4 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
5 Unboxed  (9.6)
6 The Shores of Reflec..  (9.6)
7 Lunatico  (9.6)
8 Remains  (9.5)
9 C=Bit 18  (9.5)
10 D50  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 Cuarentenauta  (9.5)
2 Listen to Your Eyes  (9.5)
3 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
4 Rewind  (9.5)
5 Instinct  (9.5)
6 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
7 Crystal Gazer  (9.5)
8 Smile to the Sky  (9.5)
9 The Tuneful Eight [u..  (9.5)
10 Bad Boy  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Fossil  (9.4)
2 PriorArt  (9.4)
3 Booze Design  (9.4)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Performers  (9.3)
Top Crackers
1 Mr. Z  (10)
2 S!R  (9.9)
3 Mr Zero Page  (9.8)
4 Mitch  (9.8)
5 1103  (9.8)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2020
Page generated in: 0.076 sec.