|
| |
|
Gold Quest III [seuck] [2006] |
AKA :
Gold Quest 3 - The Forest of Doom [seuck]
Website :
http://www.c64-wiki.de/index.php/Gold_Quest_III
Credits :
SIDs used in this release :
Download :
Look for downloads on external sites:
Pokefinder.org
User Comment
Submitted by Telespielator on 14 November 2006
I tried out Tiger Hell and can't understand, what's so special about it.
THIS is just ANOTHER SEUCK-Shooter (though it's not a bad one...)!
Gold Quest is much more inventive and seems much harder to me. |
User Comment
Submitted by Tao on 14 November 2006
| One of few S.(E.)U.C.K. games actually worth mentioning is Tiger Hell... |
User Comment
Submitted by Sledgie on 14 November 2006
Hi, maybe I make a mistake to release Gold Quest III here.
S.E.U.C.K. is for me only a tool to make faster Games than BASIC-Games. I don´t like Shooters! In the Gold Quest - Saga is not the first thing to shoot everything. The first thing is to search gold and other things like it. The main stategy is sometimes only to wait and then collect goods or run away from the bad guys. I want to make an Action-Adventure not a Shooter!
I like kids, so I like the Scene! |
User Comment
Submitted by BastetFurry on 14 November 2006
@Slator:
Then do it, at least then there would be every single commodore software ever written online. Weither its crappy or good.
No bad alphas and no "10?"HELLO!""`s, but that should be common sense ;) |
User Comment
Submitted by Richard on 13 November 2006
| I originally did a +7 trainer but I decided not to release it and deleted entry CSDB id=43510, before I even uploaded the game. Main reason was because I had second thoughts about uploading the joke release and also to show respect to the game's author. No harm done :) |
User Comment
Submitted by Slator on 13 November 2006
Maybe I got something wrong in here but since when are s.e.u.c.k. games called scene releases? It is neither a cool 1st release by crypt nor a demo. Maybe someone should start adding every single PD release that was done on the C64 to csdb so that real scener heroes like BastetFurry and rastaman can enjoy true quality releases... Nothing against the work of Richard this time as at least his musics are ok ;-D
|
User Comment
Submitted by Mermaid on 13 November 2006
| Oh noes! PLEASE don't be mean to the people who make seuck games or they might STOP MAKING SEUCK GAMES AND ADDING THEM TO CSDB, AND LEAVE THE SCENE, and that would be bad, mkay? NOW, we can surely all agree that YOU who complain about these games are CLUELESS BASTARDS. Now, BEFORE you pass judgement on the work of others I wish you would stop to think about the fact that you might FUCKING KILL their creativity and you wouldn't want that now, would YOU! |
User Comment
Submitted by Telespielator on 13 November 2006
I think, Gold Quest III is one of the best S.E.U.C.K. Games ever made. Comparing sth. like this to Games coded in assembler is unfair. I think it can only destroy the motivation of amateurs to participate in the scene. What do you expect from that?
If you don't like S.E.U.C.K. games you may ignore them and shut the fuck up! |
User Comment
Submitted by TWR on 13 November 2006
Submitted by HMVDVA [PM] on 14 November 2006
Hey, we have our dignity.
I won't even touch this game with a 10 feet pole.
Besides that, cracking SEUCK games is so TWR-like... bah.
TWR-like = The easy way! Seuck needs no cracking! This game could use a fistful of trainers, that'll be my next project. Give the "csdb-scene-police" what they deserve - no respect. :-D
|
User Comment
Submitted by HMVDVA on 13 November 2006
Hey, we have our dignity.
I won't even touch this game with a 10 feet pole.
Besides that, cracking SEUCK games is so TWR-like... bah. |
User Comment
Submitted by MRT on 13 November 2006
EHJ... WHERE'S THE HEMA CRACK?
Ohw, and throw in a trainer pleaze...
|
User Comment
Submitted by rastaman on 13 November 2006
User Comment
Submitted by The Ignorance on 13 November 2006
Funny to see people judging about the "scene" I never heard of before...
And S.E.U.C.K. is always C.R.A.P.
I love those "better release crap than nothing"-statements. |
User Comment
Submitted by Oswald on 13 November 2006
| hehe, I can imagine how ppl will praise a 10 print"I rule": goto 10 demo in 5-10 years :) |
User Comment
Submitted by jailbird on 13 November 2006
And Oswald will probably say something grumpy. So here's the Oswaldbogár pic in advance:
 |
User Comment
Submitted by Scout on 13 November 2006
| And I certainly DON'T agree what rastaman & Bastetfury are about to say. |
User Comment
Submitted by jailbird on 13 November 2006
| Yeah, I just run out of witty remarks. :( |
User Comment
Submitted by chatGPZ on 13 November 2006
| now that comment was crap JB :( |
User Comment
Submitted by jailbird on 13 November 2006
User Comment
Submitted by chatGPZ on 13 November 2006
User Comment
Submitted by jailbird on 13 November 2006
| In that case, thank you for keeping up on our level! |
User Comment
Submitted by rastaman on 13 November 2006
| blablablah. "Scene" = Kindergarten |
User Comment
Submitted by chatGPZ on 13 November 2006
User Comment
Submitted by jailbird on 13 November 2006
| @radiantx: shame on you for forming an opinion before checking out this excellent, mindblowing project which will probably turn the C64 gaming industry upside-down! You deserve a downvote! |
User Comment
Submitted by Radiant on 13 November 2006
| I have not played this, but since it's made in SEUCK, chances are very good that it is crap. And there are quite a few new games released for the C64 every month, most of them non-SEUCK, so please go complaining somewhere else about how stupid people are for not liking three-hour made triquels to crappy shooters and how they're killing the crap game scene etc. It's not impossible to release quality games these days, just look at Cadaver's excellent catalogue. |
User Comment
Submitted by A Life in Hell on 13 November 2006
@BastetFury: There was something like 60 fucking games in the last year, didn't you notice go(v) reviewing new games every fucking month?
it's games like that that make me depressed and not want to do it anymore. sigh. |
User Comment
Submitted by jailbird on 13 November 2006
I never coded a game in my life so here's da positive comment: OMG LOL now this game is so damn incredible that teh wave of the funky mega coolness whirled me off my chair!!!!11!
No wait, it sucks. |
User Comment
Submitted by rastaman on 13 November 2006
@BasketFurry
I agree.
@Groepaz
No, but making an own omlette would make sense. |
User Comment
Submitted by rastaman on 13 November 2006
User Comment
Submitted by chatGPZ on 13 November 2006
| since when you do have to make an egg to comment on the taste of an omlette? |
User Comment
Submitted by BastetFurry on 13 November 2006
At least it is a new game for our breadbin. And its fun too. ;)
@Danzig:
Before coding some demos, why dont YOU code a game when you are sooo good at coding?
Make us all go "WOW!" with YOUR new C64 game. THEN come back and criticise someone who uses Seuck. |
User Comment
Submitted by Scout on 12 November 2006
So something new can't be crap?
Edit: and it is a #&^@# SEUCK game.
FFS! It *IS* crap! |
User Comment
Submitted by rastaman on 12 November 2006
| I think that it is a new game. A new game for the C64. Not a highlight but something new. So Danzig´s comment is crap. |
User Comment
Submitted by Danzig on 10 November 2006
|
|
|
 | Search CSDb |
|
| Navigate | |
|
| Detailed Info | |
|
| Fun Stuff | |
|
| Forum | |
|
| Support CSDb | |
|
 |  |
|
![Gold Quest III [seuck]](/gfx/releases/43000/43351.png)
