|
| |
|
Bomb Chase Revival +H [2007] |
Credits :
Download :
Look for downloads on external sites:
Pokefinder.org
User Comment
Submitted by Richard on 1 February 2007
| Thanks for the support dOc :) |
User Comment
Submitted by Stainless Steel on 1 February 2007
| Smart move Richard, keep up the good work. |
User Comment
Submitted by d0c on 1 February 2007
you must not listen to the crap talk richard, a few kb here and there who cares... the loading picture makes it look much more complete and are cool... keep up the great work richard!
and to the others here, stop the crap talk and start making games to show of your skills. instead of these crap intros you put infront of programs that dont have protection and call cracks... |
User Comment
Submitted by Stainless Steel on 31 January 2007
User Comment
Submitted by Scout on 31 January 2007
Here we go again...
/me sighs and is going to follow the thread from the sideline.
Good luck! \o/ |
User Comment
Submitted by Stainless Steel on 31 January 2007
Quote from the Trivia :
"The crack is most impressive, it is linked and crunched from the original 7 files and 260 blocks to 1 file and 73 blocks"
Sorry jazzo, but I fail to see the impressiveness here.
I Strongly doubt richard was out to make the smallest possible file size of his game.
Sure, its nicely packed and shortened by whoever hides behind the crap'd label.
I assume the person in question is a long time scener,
with half decent cracking abilities, thus I would not expect anything less.
|
User Comment
Submitted by Jon on 31 January 2007
In the age of emulators, massive hard drives and high speed internet connections, why is it so important to make smaller versions of perfectly fine games?
And why is it, in a scene so small, that we have to write pissy messages in our intros? Are we attempting to make the scene even smaller? Are we trying to exile an actual PRODUCTIVE member of the scene?
This is pettiness to an extreme. If this bullshit is part of some joke that I just don't understand, someone please clue me in. |
User Comment
Submitted by Stainless Steel on 31 January 2007
Nothing against some constructive critic, but there's a fine line between making a point to some one and making a fool of someone.
I understand that there is a certain portion of humour involved but i can imagine richard might not appreciate it.
If you feel the urge to do a fix of a game, thats fine.
What I never understood is the need of some people to include notes and bells and whistles about "oh look at what a crappy job the programmer did".
I guess that's the ego trip some people are riding.
Nevertheless, i do reckon its a greatly improved version.
|
User Comment
Submitted by Scout on 31 January 2007
@SS: Picking? Constructive critisism!
If I was Richard, I'd take a good look at this release and try to learn from it. |
User Comment
Submitted by Stainless Steel on 31 January 2007
Well, its always easy picking on other peoples productions i guess.
I admit that richard might not be a second mr.cursor but nevertheless, i appreciate his efforts.
|
User Comment
Submitted by Scout on 31 January 2007
| Thumbs up for the messages :) |
User Comment
Submitted by chatGPZ on 31 January 2007
| haha, excellent scroller =) |
User Comment
Submitted by The Overkiller on 31 January 2007
| I enjoyed the intro text :) |
User Comment
Submitted by Jazzcat on 31 January 2007
| Hmm what to say to that I wonder.... |
User Comment
Submitted by d0c on 30 January 2007
| is this the new re-release that was bugfixed and improved by ricard??... or is this an earlyer version?... |
|
|
|
 | Search CSDb |
|
| Navigate | |
|
| Detailed Info | |
|
| Fun Stuff | |
|
| Forum | |
|
| Support CSDb | |
|
 |  |
|
