| |
bugjam
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 2492 |
SIDs that aren't in HVSC yet: part IV
After 317 posts in the previous one, I thought it is time again for a new thread. :-)
How about this one: Let's Party - at least I did not find any SID by that name done by Alien. |
|
... 114 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829 |
The tune in that intro?
Cowboy Kidz +2 |
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3136 |
Quote: The tune in that intro?
Cowboy Kidz +2
seems missing, added in /DEMOS/UNKNOWN as I have no idea who could be the author. Could be Newton but no real hint other than being made in FC |
| |
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829 |
Los Angeles Police Department
This is (C) 1991 Players, which is the budget label of Interceptor.
Here's a picture of the packaging: http://i.ebayimg.com/t/Los-Angeles-Police-Department-Commodore-..
Also if you complete a level you hear a jingle which is not in the HVSC file yet. |
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3136 |
Quote: Los Angeles Police Department
This is (C) 1991 Players, which is the budget label of Interceptor.
Here's a picture of the packaging: http://i.ebayimg.com/t/Los-Angeles-Police-Department-Commodore-..
Also if you complete a level you hear a jingle which is not in the HVSC file yet.
Inside it says: "copyright (c) 1991 interceptor ltd" so it's either one or the other, but ok, let's change it to Players.
About the jingle, luckily it only needs to fix the init to allow selecting the subtunes, will do it now. |
| |
The MeatBall
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 366 |
Inlay says "(c) Players Software 1991", and according to Retrocollector it was also released as LA Drugs Bust on a magazine tape
http://retrocollector.org/scans/700/27838.jpg |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11145 |
not that it'd be terribly unlikely for the music to fall under a different copyright than the game :) |
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3136 |
the field is RELEASED and not COPYRIGHT, since 2002. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11145 |
then you are discussing the wrong thing, and the copyright means nothing at all - because its equally likely that the one who owns the copyright was'nt the one doing the actual release =) |
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3136 |
wtf are you saying? YOU are entered into the discussion with this copyright thing, we only care to state who released the tune, not who held the copyright which changes with time and that's the reason the field has been changed to RELEASED. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11145 |
obvious troll is'nt obvious afterall =) |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 - Next |
