Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > C64 Coding > If it were 1987 again....
2023-07-20 15:41
Knight Rider

Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 116
If it were 1987 again....

I was watching Robin's video https://youtu.be/yVtKKb3wkYc regarding cracking from an original cassette. And it stirred a little interest in me again. To be honest I can't even remember how now but I cracked Wizball from original cassette using a Trilogic Expert (2nd version with botched ESM daughter board) and very likely V2.9 of the monitor software.

I did this again now on real hardware (as I wasn't having much luck with WinVICE 3.7), just for laughs and to try to stir up memories of way back then. Defeating Freeload now was much easier for me than back then.

I used the following packers:

MCC Compressor
then
Card Cruncher V4 (no idea who lent me this cartridge, but probably Tork&Torky)

(usual one was Matcham Time Cruncher V3.1 or a hacked version which ended up becoming Time Cruncher V3.1)

I ended up with 182 blocks incl. intro in Wizball

So it leads me to the next question, back in the day (for me) the best cracks had the smallest disk block size.

What packers did you use then on a real C64 in 1987, and what would you use now on real hardware (a. released upto 1987 and then anytime). What block size can you achieve ?

Exomizer V3.02 gives 144 blocks when no additional parameters are given.
TRIAD Wizball + is 166 with intro
Krejzi Packer $005E-$FFFF + Matcham Time Cruncher V3.1 gives 161 blocks
MCC Compressor + Matcham Time Cruncher V3.1 gives 165 blocks
Beast-Link/64k + Byte Boiler 256k V1.0 gives 148 blocks
Byte-Buster V4.1 + Byte Boiler 256k V1.0 gives 148 blocks
 
... 84 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2023-07-25 00:51
chancer

Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 346
funny you mention tork & torky, were they uk folks ? reason I ask I remember having 2 things from them , a compunet sending program and a sampler packer program IRC.

as for expert, I liked how it dealt with $0400 etc vs action replay.. and long before that how it packed games vs rivals.

not a fan of how the expert is in vice tbh.. which i find a shame, AR6 etc is far nicer / easier

I did upload the Mad mekon version of the expert software years ago. screen blanking in defreezing etc.
2023-07-25 05:45
Knight Rider

Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 116
Tork&Torky are from the UK. I visited them a few times in Greater Manchester. They cross assembled at the time from a C128 connected by cable to a C64.
2023-07-30 13:58
ChristopherJam

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1382
Quoting Knight Rider

Beast-Link/64k + Byte Boiler 256k V1.0 gives 148 blocks
Byte-Buster V4.1 + Byte Boiler 256k V1.0 gives 148 blocks

Wait, is that compressing the full 253 block original? or something that's been trimmed down a bit? Because those ratios are seriously impressive for native tools.
2023-07-30 14:10
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11149
Byteboiler was that good (remember: REU, that makes some things easier :))
2023-07-30 14:34
ChristopherJam

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1382
Ah, true - I missed the REU part somehow.

Still, very cool.
2023-07-30 21:30
Knight Rider

Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 116
The packers took 253 to 217 blocks and then the REU cruncher did the rest
2023-08-02 00:06
Bacchus

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 154
First - I have done a Fairlight Tv video on tape cracking as well, and there will be another one that also shows the production of a tape transfer. Available on friday.

I have gone through multiple stages of RLE + Cruncher.

Back in the days, on the native platform, any RLE + CruelCrunch was second to none. Easily 8 hours of crunch time but still the best result.

I then moved to EBC + DarkSqueezer 4 (for the REU support)

Last was the Skyflash range of crunchers - The AB Crunch and those.

Then I moved to PC and used Exomizer.

/Bacchus
2023-08-02 11:47
Martin Piper

Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 646
Currently the smallest I can compress a working Wizball to is 147 blocks. 37527 prg file bytes
2023-08-02 20:57
Knight Rider

Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 116
Quote: Currently the smallest I can compress a working Wizball to is 147 blocks. 37527 prg file bytes

Tell more.... which cruncher
2023-08-02 22:58
iAN CooG

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3138
Quote: Currently the smallest I can compress a working Wizball to is 147 blocks. 37527 prg file bytes

wizball_ripped.6389          │   64258
dali 0.3.2 small
wizball_ripped.dali-s.prg    │   35314

In this case it's even better than Exo 3.11, but it's not a guarantee, always test both.
Why bothering using surpassed packers & crunchers =)
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
megasoftargentina
Holy Moses/Role
lA-sTYLe/Quantum
JEZ
Viti/Hokuto Force
Guests online: 99
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.7)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
5 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
6 No Bounds  (9.6)
7 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
8 Aliens in Wonderland  (9.6)
9 Uncensored  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Happy Birthday Dr.J  (9.7)
2 Layers  (9.6)
3 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.6)
4 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
5 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
6 Copper Booze  (9.6)
7 TRSAC, Gabber & Pebe..  (9.5)
8 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Nostalgia  (9.4)
2 Oxyron  (9.3)
3 Booze Design  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 SHAPE  (9.3)
Top Diskmag Editors
1 Jazzcat  (9.4)
2 Magic  (9.4)
3 hedning  (9.2)
4 Elwix  (9.1)
5 A Life in Hell  (9.1)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.057 sec.