Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > C64 Productions > NinjaTracker released at last...
2002-10-31 22:51
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1153
NinjaTracker released at last...

Took a little longer than expected, but now NinjaTracker (with 10 rasterlines playroutine) is released. Not very userfriendly (as there's no instrument-data, only tables, tables and tables...) so approach with caution!

http://covertbitops.c64.org/tools/ninjatrk.zip

Sourcecode included, so customization is possible. Remember to do changes to both the editor's internal playroutine and the packer/relocator's playroutine (saved with packed tunes)
 
... 7 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2006-07-16 19:11
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1153
Interface IMO has not necessarily much to do with playroutine architecture & musicdata. After all, you could "edit" a song for any playroutine by just fiddling with a raw hexadecimal memorydump :) Or a more humane example, JCH editor could just as well display tracks & patterns separate, while having same musicdata & features.
2006-07-16 19:13
Bamu®
Account closed

Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332
I think interface-design MUST come first, because it exactly will tell you how to code (afterwards) the player.... :)

2006-07-16 19:19
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1153
Actually one has to answer two separate questions ..

1) what do you want to be able to do in the music (playroutine)

2) how to command those abilities in the easiest & most powerful way (editor interface)

It could be argued that the features must be at least subconsciously known, before an interface can be designed.
2006-07-16 19:20
tlr

Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1714
Quote: I think interface-design MUST come first, because it exactly will tell you how to code (afterwards) the player.... :)



This can be the case for modern PC music systems with real-time calculated audio and nearly unlimited degrees of freedom.

For a limited output device (SID) it is essential to be able to control details, hence the interface has to be player centered.

The natural way is then to program a good player, make a few test songs in it without editor (or with a rudimentary editor), and then possibly code a real editor if it's good enough to be used on more songs.
2006-07-16 19:26
Bamu®
Account closed

Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332
Quote: This can be the case for modern PC music systems with real-time calculated audio and nearly unlimited degrees of freedom.

For a limited output device (SID) it is essential to be able to control details, hence the interface has to be player centered.

The natural way is then to program a good player, make a few test songs in it without editor (or with a rudimentary editor), and then possibly code a real editor if it's good enough to be used on more songs.


Ok, this is maybe true! :)
Personally I would prefer real-time calculated stuff. :)
2006-07-16 19:29
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1153
Quote: Ok, this is maybe true! :)
Personally I would prefer real-time calculated stuff. :)


And how is this relevant to whether player or interface gets designed first?

Maybe we should need a nata-FAQ so that he doesn't need to repost in multiple threads what he likes :)
2006-07-16 19:31
Bamu®
Account closed

Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332
Quote: And how is this relevant to whether player or interface gets designed first?

Maybe we should need a nata-FAQ so that he doesn't need to repost in multiple threads what he likes :)


Heeee!

For me it's relevant!
2006-07-16 19:32
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1153
For example, Sadotracker was coded player first, and it has realtime calculated vibrato & slide. Ninjatracker was also coded that way, and it doesn't have. So, your point was?

Btw. interface tells nothing of how to spread playroutine workload on successive frames, or how to encode the patterndata for best memory usage :)
2006-07-17 01:39
Stryyker

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 465
If Nata prefers interface to be designed first then maybe he could make a fully working interface to show us how it should be.

I found when trying to make a music system (I got bored making the editing system so I stopped) that I had to adjust interface to make it more workable and more logical for the player.
2006-07-17 08:59
Bamu®
Account closed

Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332
Actually, at the moment I'm experimenting around with interfaces. It's quite a hard task to make something powerful, but with easy handling.
Previous - 1 | 2 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Yogibear/Protovision
Guests online: 69
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.8)
2 Mojo  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
6 No Bounds  (9.6)
7 Uncensored  (9.6)
8 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
9 Memento Mori  (9.6)
10 Bromance  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.7)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.7)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.5)
5 TRSAC, Gabber & Pebe..  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Wafer Demo  (9.5)
8 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
9 Quadrants  (9.5)
10 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Nostalgia  (9.3)
2 Oxyron  (9.3)
3 Booze Design  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Crest  (9.3)
Top Crackers
1 Mr. Z  (9.9)
2 S!R  (9.9)
3 Antitrack  (9.8)
4 Mr Zero Page  (9.8)
5 OTD  (9.8)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.049 sec.