| |
Nightlord
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 131 |
safe zero page addresses
can anybody verify me about whether it is safe to use zero page adresses $14 to $60 considering that no basic code will be run
or are there any more addresses in zero page that are safe to use during assembly coding (besides the $fb-$fe)
thanx |
|
| |
Graham
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 990 |
hard to say, depends on what kernal routines you use. if it's just I/O routines you use, it should work. same for floating point routines... |
| |
Graham
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 990 |
a small list of zeropage adresses which are free to use:
$92-$96 (only if no datasette is used)
$A3-$B1 (only if no RS-232 and datasette is used)
$F7-$FA (only if no RS-232 is used)
$FB-$FE (always) |
| |
cadaver
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1153 |
I've lived by the rule that at least $02-$7f is OK with ASM programs, as these are all Basic interpreter variables. |
| |
Stryyker
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 465 |
Why don't people get the Programmers Reference Guide or AAY64 or something and test? Too easy? :) |
| |
cadaver
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1153 |
You mean like, change some ZP locations, see if kernal IO still works? A bit unreliable I'd say. Though I agree 100%about the C64 PRG suggestion :) |
| |
cadaver
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1153 |
Ahm, a little correction.. the PRG zeropage descriptions were better than I remembered :) Anyway, I mean that care must be taken when one starts choosing locations above $90 or so, because it might be just luck that things still work.. |
| |
Nightlord
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 131 |
well i have the programming guide and checked the zero page map before. but mine (which is a turkish translation) only has one line explanations for each address. it does not tell which kernal routines or internal hardware buffers are connected to those addresses. maybe the english original version has more info which i will surely check.
so i apologize from people that think i am wasting forum space by this question but i do not think it is a good idea to develop code that uses a potentially unsafe range of locations for its variables. and trying to test those locations by saving data in there and then doing kernal calls and then checking the data integrity should be rather painstaking.
instead i choose to bring it up here so that whole internet can learn from the answers i get. i think that is the point of a coding forum. and it works like this in every sw engineering forum througout the world no matter how many sw engineering books are around. |
| |
Stryyker
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 465 |
Try the english version - a text version should be available at http://project64.c64.org/ or so. |
| |
Nightlord
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 131 |
oh man thanx a lot... the project 64 site should solve all my problems. i did not know of that site.... thanx everyone... |
| |
TDJ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1879 |
WIsh I found a site that would solve all my problems :) |
... 7 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |
