| |
SIDWAVE
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2238 |
Release id #77865 : VW Kever
Pull your head out of the ass, and get those converted pics deleted from this database, before its all pure crap! |
|
... 91 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3035 |
Quote: Not so coincidentally i did a quick sketch for this idea over a year ago: http://www.lieropterror.nl/csdb.jpg
yeah yeah I remember, I love it, let's do it. perff how can I help you? I can do html + js.scripting you can genereate the stuff. ;-)
no matter how those top things will be chosen (but I would preffer if they'll be chosen by trusted users and mods ;-))) |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5022 |
Quote: yeah yeah I remember, I love it, let's do it. perff how can I help you? I can do html + js.scripting you can genereate the stuff. ;-)
no matter how those top things will be chosen (but I would preffer if they'll be chosen by trusted users and mods ;-)))
- latest releases (NOT latest _added_)
- top of the month (in sander style)
this way. the latest releases will be on spotlight, so they get votes for getting a top of the month list in sander style.
I hope the last part was a joke. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11127 |
61 releases
- 12 releases have less than 5 votes
- 31 releases have no votes at all
top list for this month (release,#of votes,rating)
Fortress of Narzod 15 9.5
Sunday the 15th 5 9.1
XRAY 22 8.9
My 4 Years Old Dream 19 8.8
Oldschool Story 15 8.3
( http://rafb.net/p/xGYx2A36.html )
... oh well. it looks almost reasonable, by coincidence i guess. i predict it will be much more "funny" when the ranking actually is related to frontpage exposure :)
Quote:(but I would preffer if they'll be chosen by trusted users and mods ;-)))
no, please not =P but what about this: ONLY show those "top releases" to those people who have already voted for every release released in that particular month =) it would surely make the votes less objective - but then again only those who rated the releases will see them. win-win =)
|
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5022 |
ok, I would really love to see this happen. even with the forced vote feature :) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11127 |
i seriously like the forced voting idea... because it could actually be a good way to prevent that certain productions are upvoted by certain people just to get some frontpage exposure. AND it would increase the general amount of votes, making the whole voting thing a bit less pointless than it is right now :) |
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3035 |
Quote:I hope the last part was a joke.
no, I'm traditionalist. I like old style of doing media, editors and staff (if I got it right it's nowadays called "elites" by journalist scientists) ;-)
|
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3035 |
Quote:no, please not =P but what about this: ONLY show those "top releases" to those people who have already voted for every release released in that particular month =) it would surely make the votes less objective - but then again only those who rated the releases will see them. win-win =)
I tried similar thing in some photo gallery where people could vote, I wasn't very satisfied.. it's not very trasnparent this way. and actually top of the month is mostly about having the best stuff in the spotlight... not the best voted stuff.. if you understand what I mean. I don't think it's so hard to pick up the best stuff from every important cathegory. and btw. it could be called spotlight and it could be picked up per week basis. (if there is actually anythhing to pick, that is) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11127 |
Quote:no, I'm traditionalist. I like old style of doing media, editors and staff (if I got it right it's nowadays called "elites" by journalist scientists) ;-)
for the records: i totally agree with this. i am a big friend of competent jury voting, and i dont believe in that web2.0 1000 monkeys crap. i just dont care enough in this case to be bothered with the additional work, and i think there are much more important things that need to be done here (look at the todo list =P) |
| |
SIDWAVE
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2238 |
Groepaz: if you just added the category "converted graphics" it would be fine.. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11127 |
that wouldnt solve the problem discussed here at all, would it? and no, not even more whacked up cathegories please. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 - Next |
