Credits :
SIDs used in this release :
Download :
Look for downloads on external sites:
Pokefinder.org
User Comment
Submitted by Scarzix on 4 September 2015
| Thats not boobs, thats glued on plastic |
User Comment
Submitted by Raffox|HF on 4 December 2014
User Comment
Submitted by Hammerfist on 4 December 2014
| Dat sleazy pr0n funk! What a cool tune! Jammer, will you release the SID separately? |
User Comment
Submitted by Xiny6581 on 4 December 2014
| Quite nice! I like the technical aspect on this and yes the routine is fast. The music felt like a random jammer generator, sorry did not like it this time. As it goes for the content used, always nice with some skimmed milk ;) Perhaps you should try some 3D stuff next time. I am sure there are some graphicans out there who would supply you with hotstuff :) |
User Comment
Submitted by SplAtterpunk on 4 December 2014
User Comment
Submitted by algorithm on 4 December 2014
| @oswald, certainly other methods would give better quality, i totally agree, but at 4x4 you are looking at 4000 pixels. even if the data was packed to 400 bytes for less changes, with the more intensive decode and 4x4 fli together with the data rate of 5k per frame and running at 12fps it would be an issue. One can ofcourse process the data to force less changes per screen update which would reduce quality but overall be "decent" enough and higher quality than this tile based implementation |
User Comment
Submitted by Oswald on 4 December 2014
| algo, I think you've fallen too far on the size gaining side of the tradeoff here. maybe it would be 400 bytes or more, but I bet it would still fit a d64 and could keep up this framerate. & the quality would be much-much better. |
User Comment
Submitted by algorithm on 4 December 2014
| @Oswald. Good luck achieving the 200 bytes per frame then :-) unless there are heavy static area's in the screen. Actually the quality increase would have been higher if there were less contrasting area's in the video. (e.g the black background and transitions into the body make it a nightmare for the encoder to attempt higher quality overall) |
User Comment
Submitted by Oswald on 4 December 2014
| I'm not convinced, the blockyness got so high, that it makes me think that a 4x4x16 with a good lzw+delta pack / depack would have better results. |
User Comment
Submitted by Bitbreaker on 4 December 2014
| Makes perfect use of the loader, as one can see it is still idle a lot, as it is optimized for boobs squeezed into bits. |
User Comment
Submitted by Thierry on 4 December 2014
User Comment
Submitted by iLKke on 4 December 2014
| Look, you just made an Onslaught demo :D |
User Comment
Submitted by chatGPZ on 3 December 2014
User Comment
Submitted by Joe on 3 December 2014
+ for the effort
- for the content |
User Comment
Submitted by Yogibear on 3 December 2014
User Comment
Submitted by Jammer on 3 December 2014
| Compression blocks are big but still shapes are very easily recognizeable. I prefer natural tits, though XD |
User Comment
Submitted by algorithm on 3 December 2014
| Read the disclaimer first in the demo before commenting :-) |
|
|
 | Search CSDb |
|
| Navigate | |
|
| Detailed Info | |
|
| Fun Stuff | |
· Goofs
· Hidden Parts
· Trivia
|
|
| Forum | |
|
| Support CSDb | |
|
 |  |
|
