| |
Didi
Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 479 |
Release id #152320 : The Bear Essentials +2DP&Map
In my opinion this release should be tagged First Release / Broken because the published original is fully working PAL+NTSC and this one is not. So this is either based on a different original or it is a cracking bug.
It is just how I would judge it. |
|
... 17 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Mermaid
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 335 |
When I asked Jazzcat "Could you please wait a day or two with uploading the file for your crack of The Bear Essentials to CSDb?" he responded "Ok did that initially" which I took to mean that he didn't upload the file at first, and just created the entry without a file. If I have my facts wrong, it's because I believed what Jazzcat said. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11126 |
Quote:It's only a drama because of this new situation of a freely available game being ruled as off-limits for a crack by csdb. Is this going to be the new norm then?
last time i checked csdb didnt impose (or even enforce) these weird ideas |
| |
Jazzcat
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044 |
I guess the question is why was someone removing the dl other than myself and Pugsy. I have seen the csdb rules go one way but now they bend another |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11126 |
that is weird and unacceptable indeed |
| |
Mermaid
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 335 |
So were you lying to me when you said that initially you didn't include the file? |
| |
Jazzcat
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044 |
No. |
| |
Mermaid
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 335 |
Thank you, so Pugsy has his facts wrong. |
| |
Jazzcat
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044 |
No he does not. As i added the file again after a short period. Then someone removed it and pugsy as an admin to the entry. |
| |
Jazzcat
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044 |
And... by the time i came back much later. After i agreed to not make the file present. Someone had again removed the file. |
| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4599 |
Quote: So were you lying to me when you said that initially you didn't include the file?
Jazzcat used the same sentance we had when he created the ons entry. When someone uploaded the file, I joined in and "deleted" the file. As this is a database noone "owns" an entry, so I thought I did a good thing, following the previously added notion. Then the circus started.
I see no problem helping the developers spread their stuff a while before the public dl-link of crack releases get out - as long they ask for it. It's not like the file itself disappears - it is just not shown, so the completeness of the database is not threatened. And the releases are always available somewhere else. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next |
