| |
oziphantom
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 478 |
Chunky Perspective Mode
You know the Perspective scollers, that use FLI to crunch rows and then you have a multi bitmap with Mul1 Mul2 cells.
Would it be practical/possible to make a 3D wrapped around a cylinder like look. Like Resogun on the PS4.
The main issue is you could make the "smallest" "pixels" 4x4(or 3x3 with a background grid) but you can only get 3 unique colours per 8x8, so you would need to do bitmap modes to change which of the 3 the "4th" pixel is(sprites?). But as you get to middle the "pixels" expand to give a perspective effect.
Has any demo done this? |
|
... 18 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
JackAsser
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 1989 |
Quote: Quoting Peacemakerif the pixel is as width and height as the screen and colorflashes, we could dance to that disco light . well, not me, but others :D
So, in the limit as the pixel size goes to infinity, scrollers become colour cycling effects. Amazing!
Locally in our frame of reference. Globally in the infinite unbounded universe it's still a scroller moving at relativistic speed. |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1627 |
Nerds! |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1627 |
(...but it raises the important question of whether a scroller can be said to exist independently of there being an observer with the associated "local frame of reference".) |
| |
JackAsser
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 1989 |
Quote: (...but it raises the important question of whether a scroller can be said to exist independently of there being an observer with the associated "local frame of reference".)
The forest is still there when you don't look, right? |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1627 |
...but is it then a "forest", with all its conceptual associations, or is it "just" physical matter? |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 243 |
Quote: Locally in our frame of reference. Globally in the infinite unbounded universe it's still a scroller moving at relativistic speed.
Thats right, dear. ;) |
| |
Radiant
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 639 |
Quote: ...but is it then a "forest", with all its conceptual associations, or is it "just" physical matter?
Ah, I see what you're getting at. We're creating reality as an abstraction through observation; when we are discussing "reality" as such we are only talking about an agreed-upon model representing physicality in some sense.
Can't touch this. |
| |
lft
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 369 |
Quoting RadiantAh, I see what you're getting at. We're creating reality as an abstraction through observation; when we are discussing "reality" as such we are only talking about an agreed-upon model representing physicality in some sense.
Can't touch this.
Kant touched this. |
| |
Radiant
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 639 |
Quoting lftKant touched this.
Jarry groped it. |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1627 |
Fukuoka didn't care about it. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next |
