| |
Slammer
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 416 |
Kick Assembler Thread 2
The previous thread took a little long to load, so this is a new fresh one.. |
|
... 592 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
ruk
Registered: Jan 2012
Posts: 43 |
Change the .print to .printnow and you will see that it prints out the expected value in the first pass, before the odd "null" output.
I would say that this is bug since the value clearly is available in the first pass. The "null" is probably due to something going south while processing the .import directive |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Ok, this is weird:
.print theFile does nothing
.printnow theFile produces the correct filepath.
.import c64 theFile produces null
.import c64 "[correct path to file]" imports the file. |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Ok, this is a confirmed bug that will be resolved in the next update. |
| |
Norrland
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 14 |
Hellu...
Tried to code some stuff and ran into some problems, searched the manual but haven't found what I'm looking for.
Is it possible to modify names of variables when declaring or adressing them?
Maybe following snippet of non-working-code explains my question (in this example I would like to create 50 lists with the names list_1, list_2, list_3..):
.for (var i=0 ; i<50 ; i++)
.var list_+i=List() |
| |
Knut Clausen
Registered: Apr 2013
Posts: 18 |
Kickassembler won't let you create dynamic variable names like that.
.var myLists = List(50)
.for(var i = 0;i<myList.size();i++){
.eval myLists.add(List())
}
or
.var ht = Hashtable()
.for(var i = 0;i<50;i++){
.eval ht.put("list_" + i, List())
}
will give you what you need |
| |
Norrland
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 14 |
Thx Knut, will try that! |
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1293 |
I may have spotted parser error. PseudoPC readressing doesn't modify BNE/BEQ branches. I had tough time to spot why my piece of code, relocated to zeropage, jams and Vice monitor ensured me that's the reason. Haven't checked other branches, yet.
edit: I'm probably wrong here. Branch value is unchanged in original piece of code (contained within PseudoPC block) but is correct after relocation. It's relative addressing after all, silly me. Jam trouble is, unfortunately, unsolved so far. |
| |
Cruzer
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1048 |
Jammer: You might have discovered a special feature that detects the coder's handle and changes the output accordingly. :D |
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1293 |
LOL xD Usual foolstart of mine. Vice monitor shows branches with absolute value afterwards hence I got confused for a 'while'. BTW, crash solved. I just forgot to remove .zp markers which left after previous version of code - earlier I moved entire interrupt to zp, later only key routines ;) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11149 |
this is not normal method |
| Previous - 1 | ... | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 - Next |
