| |
Slammer
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 416 |
Kick Assembler Thread 2
The previous thread took a little long to load, so this is a new fresh one.. |
|
... 590 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1289 |
Question about functions/macros. There's clear division which does what in manual. How about piece of code that is mix of assembler and script conditions/variables - should I define the one below as macro or function?
.if(usefreqtable1)
{
.if(usefreqlo1)
{
ldx #$00
checkch1freq:
lda ch1freq, x
cmp #$fe
bne updatech1freq
ldx #$00
stx checkch1freq - 1
jmp checkch1freq
updatech1freq:
sta $d401
.if([usefreqhisweeptable1] || [constfreqhisweep1 != $00])
{
sta dofreqhisweep1 + 1
}
inx
lda ch1freq, x
sta $d400
.if([usefreqlosweeptable1] || [constfreqlosweep1 != $00])
{
sta dofreqlosweep1 + 1
}
inx
stx checkch1freq - 1
}
else
{
ldx #$00
checkch1freq:
lda ch1freq, x
cmp #$fe
bne updatech1freq
ldx #$00
stx checkch1freq - 1
jmp checkch1freq
updatech1freq:
sta $d401
.if([usefreqhisweeptable1] || [constfreqhisweep1 != $00])
{
sta dofreqhisweep1 + 1
}
inc checkch1freq - 1
.if([usefreqlosweeptable1] || [constfreqlosweep1 != $00])
{
lda #$00
sta dofreqlosweep1 + 1
}
}
}
|
| |
Slammer
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 416 |
It would have to be a macro (or pseudo command). Commands that produces bytes to the resulting .prg file (like mnemonics and .byte/.word etc) can't be in functions.
Edit: Otherwise you could make some really tricky stuff like:lda #myByteProducingFunc(27) |
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1289 |
I've tried to define that portion of code both as macro and function. Macro resulted in error due to non-assembly instructions. Function compiled without error but most probably as regular assembly that's not really a subroutine. Ok, I see that it has to be totally reorganized ;) |
| |
Slammer
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 416 |
If you are reporting error please post complete examples. When you post cutout pieces of code I have no chance of verifying if its an error or not.
I dont think I understand what you are writing. Are you sure its not when you put it in a function you get an error for using asm directives? ( = directives that produce bytes to the output) |
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1289 |
Sorry about that :) Macro seems to work fine - it was just enclosed within .if directive that I didn't catch somehow. No error report whatsoever and thank you for the tip ;) |
| |
Hoogo
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 102 |
I guess there are situations where automatic long branches are difficult:
---> Dest 1
| ...
| -<Branch 2
| | ...
--+<Branch 1
| ...
-->Dest 2 Branch2 cannot be decided until Branch 1 was decided, and the other way around the same.
But such a situation can already be created with an .if (futureLabelFormual)FillSomeBytesFormula. How do you treat that? Forbid .if with unknown labels? Or some check if passes get out of sync? |
| |
Slammer
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 416 |
You guessed it , using if's on yet unknown values gives an error since the memlocation of labels have to be resolved in first pass. |
| |
TWW
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 541 |
I saw I asked this thing like 4 years ago and surely found some work-around back then but that is several HD crashes ago and perhaps there are updates I didn't catch.
Strings:
I am making a string for a cartridge header but it contains some RVRS ON characters and stuff. The question is how do I avoid doing this hack:
.const CartridgeName = "C64GS C" // Maximum 32 bytes.
.text CartridgeName
.byte $61,$72,$74,$72,$69,$64,$67,$65
Basically what I would like to do is to append the constant with the bytes as added data to the string. This again to allow me to fill in the surplus available characters without having to cheat:
.fill 32-CartridgeName.size()-8,0
So what I would like to do is:
.const CartridgeName = "C64GS C"+hexBytes($61,$72,$74,$72,$69,$64,$67,$65) |
| |
TWW
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 541 |
Hmm another thing I saw now was that I get an error when compiling my code after updating Kickass (was using old version):
.var ZP = $02
.const FetchDataVector = ZP .eval ZP+=2
Have to move the ".eval ZP+=2" to a new line but it used to assemble just fine. Will make my ZP variable declarations a lot more messy ^^ |
| |
Scan
Registered: Dec 2015
Posts: 110 |
You don't need to move it to a new line, you can also use ; to separate the statements:
.var ZP = $02
.const FetchDataVector = ZP ; .eval ZP+=2
|
| Previous - 1 | ... | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | ... | 61 - Next |
