| |
Didi
Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 479 |
Event id #2636 : Crack Intro Music Competition 2017
After the geat success in 2013, the time has come for another Crack Intro Music Competition!
Several people have asked for it and finally it happens.
This time I have a skilled co-organizer with Jammer.
Competition runs from September 29, 2017, until October 29, 2017. So you have a full month to deliver your creations.
Please use this thread for questions, discussion and everything else concerning this competition.
THE RULES (same as in 2013, worked very well):
- max. playtime 1:00 min. (PAL playing speed), then repeat or fade.
- max. size: $1000 bytes (preferably located in memory at $1000-$2000)
- single speed only
- no SID model preference (should sound good on all SID models)
- must be handed in as executable format .sid or .prg (might be embedded in .t64 or .d64)
- no graphics or even intro-like presentation is allowed to be included.
- Productions using the music might be released after the voting deadline. The voting should be focused on the music itself.
- the participating musics may not have been released or used in a public production before.
- multiple entries per musician allowed.
Deadline for entry submission is October 29, 2017 at 23:59:59 (11:59:59 pm).
Voting closes one week later at November 6, 2017 at 23:59:59 (11:59:59 pm).
Voting platform is CSDb (with all disadvantages it may have), therefore entries have to be posted here.
Entries will be ranked by weighted average of CSDb votes. Entries with the same weighted average are ranked by their percentages of 10s, 9s, etc.
No prices to win, just the fame. May the best creation win! |
|
... 146 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
lft
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 369 |
Quoting Linus
- no SID model preference (should sound good on all SID models)
...
I don't see a proper scientific, ahem, way to judge whether a tune complies to that rule or not.
Entries could be disqualified if they explicitly state the preferred SID model somewhere.
We can also adapt the judging process, in the spirit of the rule, like this: We all randomise the SID model before listening to each tune. Half the people will judge it based on how it sounds on 6581, half based on how it sounds on 8580. If it sounds great on both, the average score will be higher. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11129 |
or just randomize the votes alltogether :) |
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1289 |
Jeez. It's not about SID flag. It's about not sounding like muffled diarrhea on 6581 (and believe - all regular MSL stuff, for example, would sound like this on 6581). Don't worry, LFT, you have least to fear in this respect ;) In practice it's mostly about taking more classical approach where to put filter and where not to. Tune DOESN'T have to sound identical on both chips. |
| |
Linus
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 639 |
Yeah, but whhhhyyyyyy?! :) I don't wanna touch that old fella :) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11129 |
thats what she said |
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1289 |
Quoting Groepazthats what she said
 |
| |
Stinsen
Registered: Feb 2012
Posts: 71 |
This thread is gold, you guys are cracking me up (no pun intended). :D |
| |
TheRyk
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 2076 |
Quote:I can promise I won't make a fuss about that damn 1:01 and will prevent Didi from being nazi about it.
ROFL xD |
| |
Xiny6581
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 72 |
Awesome... :) Will do my magic 6581+8580 and attend with magic too ;D |
| |
Scarzix
Registered: Aug 2010
Posts: 143 |
So SID detection in player is the way to go - aka we now know that composers with that option will be able to make the best results.
Think I might go the oppersite way: Do I get + points for NOT using filters then? :-) |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 16 - Next |
