| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Group id #4593 : Cracking Service Incorporated
Why is this group in CSDb? (click on text to read more) |
|
| |
The MeatBall
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 367 |
Quote:Trivia :
As CSI switched in 1989 to the Commodore Amiga , they changed there group name to The Blues Brothers (TBB).
Switched to Amiga in 1989, yet listed on CSDb as dissolved in 1992?
TBB has 1 single Amiga ECS intro listed on Pouet.
I don't see any need for this to be in CSDb, unless some c64 releases turn up (and by then the group + members can be re-added).
|
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Indeed. |
| |
tnu
Account closed
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 42 |
..partly i agree...but does it mean we should delete all cracking/demogroups that doesnt has any releases added to them?... |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11354 |
the question is, why ADD groups with no releases at all? |
| |
tnu
Account closed
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 42 |
Quote: the question is, why ADD groups with no releases at all?
..when it comes to import,demo and crackergroups - indeed.....waste of space.. |
| |
bugjam
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 2581 |
Quote: the question is, why ADD groups with no releases at all?
Old thread, but I still wanted to answer this question. The reason is simple: you read something about a group or a scener in, say, an old diskmag. You add this information, the next one adds the next information from another diskmag, and thus the database grows. And maybe years later a release is found and added.
Of course it is a waste of space. If like 5.7 trillion entries like this are entered, we are going to run out of server space. |
