| |
Sander
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 493 |
Graphics on C64 demoscene: Guide of Ethics – a Proposal
Dear fellow sceners,
This is an attempt to get more understanding among, and for, C64 demoscene pixel artists. It’s not written to limit anyone, but a prayer for more transparency.
Read the document here: ->Graphics on C64 demoscene: Guide of Ethics – a Proposal<-
We tried to give define and value different processes. Which is a result of discussion, where we saw mutual grounds and felt the need to write these down.
We will update the document periodically, when enough input has been gathered and sorted out.
We’d really love to hear your thoughts on the subjects in the document.
Please post them in this thread.
(Personally I will not always fully comply to these guidelines myself, but I will continue to be transparant about it. However, I do agree with the values communicated in this document.) |
|
... 140 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
PAL
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 271 |
arch0N: cool post |
| |
acrouzet
Registered: May 2020
Posts: 80 |
In the end, do what's most fulfilling to YOU, and surely there will be people who appreciate it. |
| |
arch0N
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 12 |
Quote: arch0N: cool post
Thanks Man and great post of yours #10, fully agree there. |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 121 |
Quote: Technology is simply a tool
While this claim makes sense when put together with the rest of the sentence, as it was made to show that technology is dependent on human operator, I just want to point out that on its own, this claim is dead wrong. In context of your post = right, on its own = dead wrong.
What you’re saying is very defetistic, you’re basically saying: if you are a charcoal drawing artist and they invent a charcoal drawing machine, you should better quickly learn how to oil and service this machine, as this will be your job from now on. Mutate or die. It’s very defetistic and perhaps very true.
But why are we philosophizing about “AI” here, let’s get back to the conversation about the paper. |
| |
Hein
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 933 |
Quoting 4gentEQuote: Technology is simply a tool
While this claim makes sense when put together with the rest of the sentence, as it was made to show that technology is dependent on human operator, I just want to point out that on its own, this claim is dead wrong. In context of your post = right, on its own = dead wrong.
What you’re saying is very defetistic, you’re basically saying: if you are a charcoal drawing artist and they invent a charcoal drawing machine, you should better quickly learn how to oil and service this machine, as this will be your job from now on. Mutate or die. It’s very defetistic and perhaps very true.
But why are we philosophizing about “AI” here, let’s get back to the conversation about the paper.
Or, if you're an oil painter, you can use an iPad with Procreate (as a tool) and mimic oil paint.
But adaptation seems a good strategy indeed if you want to be ahead of the curve. |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 121 |
Quote: Or, if you're an oil painter, you can use an iPad with Procreate (as a tool) and mimic oil paint.
Or you can use an iPad with or without Procreate as a literal tool for applying paint to the canvas. ;) |
| |
Hein
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 933 |
Quoting 4gentEQuote: Or, if you're an oil painter, you can use an iPad with Procreate (as a tool) and mimic oil paint.
Or you can use an iPad with or without Procreate as a literal tool for applying paint to the canvas. ;)
Even better! |
| Previous - 1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 - Next |
