Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Entries > Release id #165554 : Tacky +2HD
2018-06-18 19:39
O'Dog

Registered: Mar 2017
Posts: 11
Release id #165554 : Tacky +2HD

Always the same old discussion about what has to be credited as "crack". Even more confusing CSDb now uses different definitions for credits and release type.

There have been a lot of games which never had a protection and claimed to be cracked by someone (even by well known "real" crackers who were able to break protections). Do you plan to verify every crack entry if the original it was made from had a protetion to crack? Have a lot of fun with that.
 
... 19 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2018-06-21 22:45
Jazzcat

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044
Whole lot of blablabla.

Crackers can do whatever they want with this stuff. They did it in the past many many times. Conformity will struggle as opinions differ. I think write it in the scroll text the way you want, what happens on a DB like this, forget about it. :D
2018-06-22 14:06
hedning

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4595
Quote: Whole lot of blablabla.

Crackers can do whatever they want with this stuff. They did it in the past many many times. Conformity will struggle as opinions differ. I think write it in the scroll text the way you want, what happens on a DB like this, forget about it. :D


Yes. Call it what you want in your scrollers. If you want to call linking cracking in your scroller - nobody will complain (but people will laugh of course, and mock you. IRC is a good place for that ;)). But in a database of this kind we need to be exact, and we do have people here that actually knows if there was cracking involved or not. The facts of the database should not be debateable. We, the users signed up here, should all help the database to aim for preciseness.
2018-06-22 14:33
Jazzcat

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044
Well, don't think anyone questions on when a protection was cracked or a protection did not exist etc. But more, that the word crack has indeed been used many many times as a reference to modification of some kind.
2018-06-22 14:42
Goat

Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 42
Then please add at least these new credit categories instead of simply "crack": unpacking, password removing, improving, shortening, high saver including, onefiling, levelpacking, including picture, changing device number, etc... and maybe even unboxing the original, inserting the disk correctly, eating and farting.
2018-06-22 14:59
Compyx

Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 631
Quoting Goat
farting.


+1
2018-06-24 19:37
Mr.Ammo
Account closed

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 228
Best thing to do is to break with traditions. Traditions are holding back progress.

Not sure if CSDb needs or even wants to be a meta-data database. It's an archive for releases as I have been told numerous times and it's doing a pretty good job at that.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
wacek/arise
csabanw
niallquinn
j0x
Guests online: 155
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.8)
2 Mojo  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
6 No Bounds  (9.6)
7 Uncensored  (9.6)
8 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
9 Memento Mori  (9.6)
10 Bromance  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.7)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.7)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.5)
5 TRSAC, Gabber & Pebe..  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Wafer Demo  (9.5)
8 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
9 Quadrants  (9.5)
10 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Oxyron  (9.3)
2 Nostalgia  (9.3)
3 Booze Design  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Crest  (9.3)
Top Original Suppliers
1 Black Beard  (9.5)
2 Derbyshire Ram  (9.5)
3 hedning  (9.2)
4 Baracuda  (9.1)
5 Irata  (8.5)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.036 sec.