Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Entries > Group id #4733 : Onslutt
2007-03-29 11:27
null
Account closed

Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 645
Group id #4733 : Onslutt

this group is clearly fake and made because people don't like crackers or something... just look at the groupname and handles... don't they remind you of others? =)
------------------------------------
Knoeki/DigitalSoundsSystem/SwappersWithAttitude
2007-03-29 11:28
SIDWAVE
Account closed

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2238
Yeah, only lamers behave like that..
2007-03-29 11:29
Trazan

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 620
I already did request this to be removed - lets see if Perff does anything about it or not.

We all know this is crap anyway
2007-03-29 11:38
Rough
Account closed

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829
Quote: this group is clearly fake and made because people don't like crackers or something... just look at the groupname and handles... don't they remind you of others? =)
------------------------------------
Knoeki/DigitalSoundsSystem/SwappersWithAttitude


really?
2007-03-29 11:50
Jazzcat

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044
Quote: I already did request this to be removed - lets see if Perff does anything about it or not.

We all know this is crap anyway


I find it funny but a pity they didn't make their own intro instead of ripping others work (both RRR picture/intro and the Onslutt logo).

2007-03-29 11:53
The Ignorance

Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 85
I am now even more impressed of these skills.
Wow! I think the best cracking-group (C****) should do a coop
with them...
And let's wait who makes the best trainer-version of Laxity's
tune.

2007-03-29 12:05
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
This bullshit is clearly totally out of bounds.
Is that whats left of the C64 scene in 2007 ?

fake labels (all of them!) and schoolyard kiddybashin' ?

Utterly retarded.

2007-03-29 12:11
The Ignorance

Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 85
Ofcourse. I think that's the message behind certain fake-labels. But better bash the
fake-labels than bashing the lamers started first releasing crap.
THAT is really retarded.

HAIL EVERYBODY WHO RELEASES CRAP, BETTER THAN BEING INACTIVE!

P.S. Hopefully there is nobody else needed to fix my next anti-intro, maybe give it to me, before.
Will fix it for free then.
2007-03-29 12:20
ptoing

Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 271
"HAIL EVERYBODY WHO RELEASES CRAP, BETTER THAN BEING INACTIVE!"

I think I disagree there. I would rather not release anything, before releasing a pile of noeffort poop. But I am not in the cracking scene so I don't really care.
2007-03-29 12:25
Frantic

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1627
I am all with Ptoing on that matter..
2007-03-29 12:28
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Quoting the ignorance
But better bash the
fake-labels than bashing the lamers started first releasing crap.
THAT is really retarded.


Whats that supposed to mean ?

I mean, do we really need fake groups like CRAP'D and now this ?

Whatever. Apparently people, though way into their 30's haven't matured beyond this kiddyshit. Hilarious.

2007-03-29 12:39
TDJ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1879
Quote: I am all with Ptoing on that matter..

Me too.
2007-03-29 12:40
The Ignorance

Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 85
Quite easy.

CRYPT releases only bullshit, nobody cares.
Fake-labels release bullshit, everybody whines.
CRYPT releases even more bullshit on a even lamer fakelabel and still less are whining about this than the first lamer-label.

Quote Groepaz:
The difference is, this is clearly labelled as CRAP('D).

What about everybody stops releasing senseless crap?
Even 20 years ago SEUCK-Games were shit.
Everybody is crying here, don't attack the few people releasing something new.
Where is the need of things which are worser than 20 years ago?
And if everybody doesn't care about the quality of releases why do they care about fake-releases? Is that explainable?

2007-03-29 12:56
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Quoting the ignorance
CRYPT releases only bullshit, nobody cares.
Fake-labels release bullshit, everybody whines.
CRYPT releases even more bullshit on a even lamer fakelabel and still less are whining about this than the first lamer-label.


I believe crypt got their share of spanking in that matter.

Quote:

What about everybody stops releasing senseless crap?


I agree, totally.

Quote:

Even 20 years ago SEUCK-Games were shit.
Everybody is crying here, don't attack the few people releasing something new.
Where is the need of things which are worser than 20 years ago?


True, and the general opinion is still the same i believe.

BUT. its one thing if you sit down and actually design your own SEUCK game and release it yourself.

Its a totally other mindless piece of shit to intro-link someone else's SEUCK game call it a release.

Thats where the crap starts.

Quote:

And if everybody doesn't care about the quality of releases
why do they care about fake-releases? Is that explainable?


Because releasing crap is one thing.

Forming a fake group and releasing even more crap is taking the crap to the next level.

And frankly thats too much crap piled upon crap for most of us to bare with.

2007-03-29 13:07
The Ignorance

Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 85
But still the crap on purpose shows more skills than the crap
out of dumbness.

And who released SEUCK-games? TWG, CHOP SUEY or whoever?

For some of the games done by TWG, WWW.GB64.COM was quite thankful, as they were new.
In contrary to what? Releasing SEUCK-Games or leeching
lame versions from www.gb64.com and jewelizing them with
even more lameness?
So doing a fake-label is crappier than releasing crap under
your real flag? Yes, that's logic.
I saw no TWG-release since WDR disappeared.
I could understand CreaMD or Oswald's point, but I don't
understand bashing a clearly as fake-labelled group while
there are even lamer ones out there.

2007-03-29 13:39
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Quote:
So doing a fake-label is crappier than releasing crap under
your real flag? Yes, that's logic.


Actually yes, thats what I'm saying.

If you really need to start getting onto people because of the quality of their releases, then by all means do it.

But at least have the balls to use your real name, instead of hiding behind some fake group/handle.

Quote:

I saw no TWG-release since WDR disappeared.
I could understand CreaMD or Oswald's point, but I don't
understand bashing a clearly as fake-labelled group while
there are even lamer ones out there.


Well, thats your opinion and you're entitled to it.

Cheers.
2007-03-29 14:02
The Ignorance

Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 85
1. Who is hiding here behind what is the question.
Everybody able to click could see my 2nd handle.
Free to hire.

2. First little ILLEDUCATION himself started to attack me in pm here as I pointed out he wrote a word (in his motherlanguage!) wrong.
I wrote sth to CRYpt+WDR because of the quality.
Then I got mail-spam and saw a buggy and crappy FUCK THE IGNORANCE intro (where still is missing the comma, btw). Which really shocked me as it looked like coded in BASIC.
So who started with the fake-labels?

3. I like fake-labels! They are fucking funny, if they are
done in the right way.

Yeah, call me IGNORANCEBOGAR.


2007-03-29 14:21
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Quoting The Ignorancebogar

1. Who is hiding here behind what is the question.
Everybody able to click could see my 2nd handle.
Free to hire.

3. I like fake-labels! They are fucking funny, if they are
done in the right way.


Yes, obviously you have a history with that.

Back in the old days or today, i still think its rather dumb. But thats just my opinion.

2007-03-29 14:39
The Ignorance

Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 85
I should start on talking about demos.
Reverse-psychology.

History in that... Sure.

Still I don't care about your opinion as every real member of
the real old crackinscene have to care about the opinion of
the forumsceners and gamerlamers. Complicated!
You want to tell us what?

I was once in ONSLAUGHT and this is enough for me.
But everybody could see who is who.
And I have no fake-logins and vote public.
But nevertheless why do I have to argue each day with members
of the demoscene, little gamerlamers or forumsceners about
things regarding "cracking-scene" ?
Did I ever say BAMU's music is shit because he is an idiot?
Or anything in this direction ? Why do everybody here has
to talk and argue about things and times they never
have/had/will have a single conclusion ?
Fungus was the first to leave and looks like I have to follow.
Go on and play the frozen l33t-versions of l33t-games from
l33t-groups. I don't FUCKING CARE anylonger.
Maybe WDR could set up his brilliant homepage and you could
link it directly to here...

BYEBYE...
2007-03-29 14:57
Stainless Steel

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Chill out dude, this isn't a pissing contest.

I merely told you what i think about fake labels.

If that gets your panties twisted then I'm sorry but my opinion stands. Welcome to the free world.

And please, don't lecture me about the "old cracking scene".
I might have not been a cracker, but I've been there and seen it.

I'm the last person to have any issues about cracking and skilled crackers, i highly respect anyone who has the skills (guess what, this includes you too. duh).

What i detest though, is the whole fake label bullshit.

If you need to make this a personal matter, fine. Have it your way.

RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Knight Rider/TREX
Six/G★P
JackAsser/Booze Design
pcollins/Quantum
iceout/Avatar/HF
Mike
csabanw
Sumaleth/Pearl
Guests online: 125
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.8)
2 Mojo  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
6 No Bounds  (9.6)
7 Uncensored  (9.6)
8 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
9 Memento Mori  (9.6)
10 Bromance  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.7)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.7)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.5)
5 TRSAC, Gabber & Pebe..  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Wafer Demo  (9.5)
8 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
9 Quadrants  (9.5)
10 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Nostalgia  (9.3)
2 Oxyron  (9.3)
3 Booze Design  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Crest  (9.3)
Top Logo Graphicians
1 Sander  (9.9)
2 Facet  (9.6)
3 Mermaid  (9.4)
4 Pal  (9.4)
5 Shine  (9.3)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.049 sec.