| |
Laxity
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
SID Factory
Ok.. So.. I added it and called it an alpha release since it's not yet completely done and subject to fundamental changes, especially in the file format.
SID Factory 0.5 (alpha 1) |
|
... 54 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Laxity
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
Actually I'm kind of intrigued by these nursing features, but if I'm to implement them I want to do it properly, and that's proving rather difficult, especially as the code for SID Factory is rather big.. Maybe I should start thinking about using $d000-$e000 too ;) |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5031 |
lol yeah, why nursing feats ? give them the player source in tasm format, then they can just edit the .byte lines like a charm :) |
| |
Laxity
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
;) .. I realize that not everybody are programmers. |
| |
j0x
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 215 |
Oswald: That's exactly how my "editor" works! :) Gives a lot of freedom to the composer. Not very comfortable composing, though.
[irony] Maybe that's why I keep releasing hundreds of tunes? [/irony].
Laxity: What new features ("unique selling points") or combination of features does SF provide? I'm always curious about new audio innovations!
/Stefan |
| |
Laxity
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
Quote: Oswald: That's exactly how my "editor" works! :) Gives a lot of freedom to the composer. Not very comfortable composing, though.
[irony] Maybe that's why I keep releasing hundreds of tunes? [/irony].
Laxity: What new features ("unique selling points") or combination of features does SF provide? I'm always curious about new audio innovations!
/Stefan
Eh.. Download and try, that's probably the best way to find out.
I wrote the editor mostly for myself as I would like to have one that was scalable (to a certain extend) around what ever player I cook up. |
| |
abaddon
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 28 |
how about transposing sequences downwards? see sdi for implementation |
| |
Sidder
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 56 |
Quote: how about transposing sequences downwards? see sdi for implementation
Note that in SF / JCH standard (default) transposition for sequences is +$C. So you can use $0 - $0B in track list (isn't one octave enough? ;)
Laxity, is it possible to comeback to SF after reset? Any SYS? |
| |
Laxity
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
Hmm.. Dunno, never had to recover from reset. Did the editor crash?
I think the memory manager might screw up if you try to sys $0840 or the state delegator might not be reset correctly, but I'm raelly not sure. I can test it.... |
| |
Laxity
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
No, you cannot sys back into the editor or menu or anything - it doesn't crash, but just doesn't respond to input as. I can fix it for the next release (which is november at the soonest because of maximum work pressure). |
| |
Laxity
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
Quote: how about transposing sequences downwards? see sdi for implementation
Was that $8c default transposition answer enough?
I ran SDI once, and if I remember correctly, it displays or can display notes transposed in the sequences. Pretty cool I think, which makes the relative transposition a lot more dynamic when editing because you'll actually hear the notes you type not the notes you type plus some obscure transposition. I like that! While praising SDI, I might as well add that I find the 4th utility-track (or what to call it?) a brilliant concept. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 - Next |
