Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > The voting system is completely retarded
2018-03-31 19:37
jailbird

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578
The voting system is completely retarded

I just can't wrap my head around this unmitigated, pure crap we use for voting. Here's a situation where I actually have to vote waaaay lower than it deserves, in order to increase a release's rating.

This is simply ridiculous.



"Hey, this release is really cool, I'll give it a tenner."




"WTF, the rating got lower?!? Ok, maybe it counts as an illicit upvote and it is filtered with some clever algorythm, let's go with 9 then."




"Damn, now it's way lower than it would be without my vote. Maybe an 8 will help?"




"Nah, this is getting worse, but let's see what happens if I vote with a 7."




"Shit, still no good, I'll jump to an ever lower number just for the sake of experiencing more of this shit."




"Oh great, now we're getting somewhere, one more try."




"YEY! I love this release, so it will get a 6 from me."
 
... 66 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2018-04-02 14:54
Mr.Ammo
Account closed

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 228
Quoting GH/MSL/Toondichters
@Mr Ammo: "Tyranny" because of some C-64 release at the age of 40+? I don't think so :D


Well, then stop arguing for banning anonymous voting.
2018-04-02 15:47
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5086
or do it like on pouet, no point then to complain about voting :) thumb up or not.
2018-04-02 15:50
Perplex

Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 255
Quoting Jailbird
Why is this list of number of votes per value necessary at all?


It contains more information that any average score would.

If you don't like how the weighted average is calculated, you can use the statistical data to calculate your own average, weighted any way you like (or not weighted at all.)
2018-04-02 16:02
jailbird

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578
Or if you don't like your rating, just imagine all the votes you got are 10. Problem no more!
2018-04-02 16:09
Mixer

Registered: Apr 2008
Posts: 447
Jailbird: hah, exactly.

One can imagine an adhoc compo, which has a rule that voters should only vote the winner by giving it 10, and no other votes, also every participant gets 1 vote of 10 as if they voted themselves. That way every entry that is voted will get 10 average, and the winner can be selected by most votes.
2018-04-02 18:05
GH

Registered: Sep 2014
Posts: 77
@Mr Ammo: Down voting anonymous should be banned. Of course.

All the other solutions are annoying and won't solve anything.

Don't waste your ammo ;)
2018-04-02 19:26
Linus

Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 639
No, forced public voting will make things worse :) Even less votes will result in averages that don’t mean a thing at all anymore. Also it‘ll stir up drama a lot. People are people no matter the age.

If you compare the averages of hidden and public votes you’ll find they don’t differ much anyway.
2018-04-02 19:50
hedning

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4720
Vote if you want, and care if you want, but CSDb is not about voting. Enjoy the releases and have fun. Over and out.
2018-04-03 08:08
Zirias

Registered: Jan 2014
Posts: 48
Quoting Mr Ammo
If you look at the data. Do you really think there's a problem with down voting? Or anonymous voting?
Most definitely not.

Quoting Mr Ammo
Is it likely that public voters have a bias towards up voting or voting what is socially desired?
But it sure looks like this is the case? In fact, with the results you calculated, I'd argue that *public* voting should be disabled. With a scale of 10 values, it's silly to only use the top two or three. A 6 or 7 should be considered a good vote, just not an excellent one. With public votes, you can't expect honest votes, that's it...

As for the obscure weighting algorithm, either drop it entirely or maybe it might make sense to at least take the total amount of votes into consideration as well, using a scale from not applying any weighting at all with only 15 or fewer votes to fully applying the weighting starting at 50 votes.
2018-04-03 09:21
jailbird

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578
Quoting hedning
Vote if you want, and care if you want, but CSDb is not about voting.

Ah, the good ole' "if you don't think about it, it doesn't exist" answer to all the issues.

Why are the charts and ratings on crucial sections of the site then? You could trivialize it as much as you want, but voting is a vital part of CSDb.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
MAT64
t0m3000/hf^boom!^ibx
Mr SQL
McMeatLoaf
mutetus/Ald ^ Ons
Trash
WVL/Xenon
sln.pixelrat
Didi/Laxity
Airwolf/F4CG
d0c
Ghost/Quantum
KLR/NoName
Hypnosis/TSD
Guests online: 102
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 Uncensored  (9.6)
7 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
8 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
9 No Bounds  (9.6)
10 Christmas Megademo  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top Swappers
1 Derbyshire Ram  (10)
2 Jerry  (9.8)
3 Violator  (9.7)
4 Acidchild  (9.7)
5 Cash  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.042 sec.