Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Entries > Release id #53316 : Ikari & Talent Intro
2007-09-20 09:35
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386
Release id #53316 : Ikari & Talent Intro

mmmh its somehow getting out of hand. intros that werent released like this (single file, without a crack attached) shouldn't get a seperate entry.
 
... 37 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2007-09-20 10:00
Rough
Account closed

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829
Just because you two say it's wrong, it isn't wrong.

Give me a proper argument not to add those intros and even better a solution how to add intros and their credits to the database or be quiet.

Sure they are no single releases, that's why the cracks are entered as download and that's why I didnt add a release group to their entries.
2007-09-20 10:03
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386
the point is that only _unaltered_ releases that were released exactly like this (in the download) should get an entry. ripping the intro from the crack is wrong (no altered releases), just like adding cracks as a download (those files belong to the crack entry).

also its not just us two. this has been beaten to death already =)
2007-09-20 10:06
Rough
Account closed

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829
Cracks belong to the crack entry and it's also useful to have them as download to the fitting intro entry.

"not just us two".. evidence?

I want to hear more opinions of others!
2007-09-20 10:10
Mace

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799
This is a DATAbase, not a file server.

As long as it's not possible to properly add credits to crack intros that go with the crack, I think Rough's idea isn't too bad.

After all, we are interested in the information here.
If Rough's way isn't right, then suggest a way to properly credit intros in some other fashion.
2007-09-20 10:13
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386
there is no proper way right now. yes its a database flaw. and no adding them all anyway isnt a good idea, since that will mean major work once such a feature is made.
2007-09-20 10:45
Trazan
Account closed

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 620
Support zyrons project, Intros.c64.org instead, thank you!

2007-09-20 11:59
Steppe

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 1510
Flame me, but I like how Rough is doing it. One entry per intro with nice additional info and all the sids added that got used.

@Groepaz et al.: Be careful not to slip into a narrow minded finance office accountant mentality. Sorry if it sounds a bit hard, but I get the impression that you're sometimes insisting on "the rules" just for the sake of it. Finetune the rules instead if someone brings up something interesting that lies outside the current scope.
2007-09-20 12:27
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386
we are working on "finetuning" the rules.

however, quality (and that also means database consistancy and integrity) comes WAY before quantity. all this stuff can be done later when it can be done properly. it's not like anyone would run out of work until then =)
2007-09-20 12:30
Steppe

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 1510
Hehe, now THAT we can agree on for sure! ;-)
2007-09-20 12:32
Scout

Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 1570
Quote: Flame me, but I like how Rough is doing it. One entry per intro with nice additional info and all the sids added that got used.

@Groepaz et al.: Be careful not to slip into a narrow minded finance office accountant mentality. Sorry if it sounds a bit hard, but I get the impression that you're sometimes insisting on "the rules" just for the sake of it. Finetune the rules instead if someone brings up something interesting that lies outside the current scope.


Don't get me wrong, i have nothing against uploading intros.
But what I've stated earlier, I find it nonsense to upload crack-stripped intros for preservation sake.
For this we have intros.c64.org already and the original crackrelease.
Maybe cross-referencing from intro.c64.org with csdb (and vice-versa) might be an idea but that's something for the site-developers.

All I want is a clean scene database that represents a clear (and clean) view of what is released in the C64 cracking- and demoscene.
Those intros are not the case.

Now we have uploads of crackintros. What's next? Pictures ripped from demos?

On a sidenote, cheers for Rough for uploading and updating the csdb-entries (the non-crackintro's that is ;-).
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Fred/Channel 4
Acidchild/Padua
Mason/Unicess
Guests online: 112
Top Demos
1 The Lethal Christmas..  (9.7)
2 Next Level  (9.7)
3 13:37  (9.7)
4 Mojo  (9.7)
5 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
6 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
9 Uncensored  (9.6)
10 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 No Listen  (9.6)
2 Layers  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
5 Copper Booze  (9.6)
6 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
7 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Morph  (9.5)
10 Libertongo  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Triad  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top Webmasters
1 Slaygon  (9.6)
2 Perff  (9.6)
3 Sabbi  (9.5)
4 Morpheus  (9.4)
5 CreaMD  (9.1)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.059 sec.