| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 675 |
Release id #116895 : Asteroids Emulator (Build March 18, 2013)
Not that I'm against this entry, but in general I think CSDb should not be used as versioning-database and maybe we need some sort of "rule" on this in case people dont want it this way.
I know it wasnt the coder creating this entry but that's beside the point imho.
Any comments? Similar things went on before, maybe I should just not care :) |
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11157 |
another case of "how relying on common sense doesnt work" eh? =P |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 675 |
To add (as of March 19th, 5:53 pm)
Asteroids Emulator (Build March 18, 2013)
Asteroids Emulator (Build March 17, 2013)
Asteroids Emulator (Build March 6, 2013)
Asteroids Emulator (Build March 2, 2013)
Asteroids Emulator SCPU (Build February 28, 2013)
Asteroids Emulator (Build February 26, 2013)
Asteroids Emulator (Build February 23, 2013)
(not including the Laxity & Onslaught cracks which I consider valid for here) |
| |
bepp
Registered: Jun 2010
Posts: 265 |
Well it seems the author himself is not to blame here. |
| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4623 |
I agree, now when I see it. It's quite obvious when you see the evergrowing pile of versions - there is no final version it seems. I think we should kill all versions except the latest one (because there is no scenerelease of that one) - just as we only should add games that are not cracked (scenerelated) to the database. On the other hand it seems like completeness of versions are important in other cases (emulators etc). What do people think? I have to read the rules again. |
| |
Skate
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 492 |
an optional svn/git link may be added to the products and only latest build may be kept. also being able to transfer download counter to the new executable would be nice. it's like not completely deleting the download link but updating it with the new one. |
| |
spider-j
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 454 |
I think updating one entry will lead to even more confusion. What about a 'max 1 entry per month' (or two months) rule? |
