| |
bugjam
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 2610 |
Release id #98851 : Mona Lisa
I found this odd case here. And i really don't understand why the addition to csdb is counted as release here. It was obviously "released" (albeit illegitly) by whoever put this unfinished part on a disk and then made this disk available to public, whenever that was (as WEC stated in the trivia, this might never be known). So for me it is clear that both the "releaser" field and the release date should be empty.
Unless wacek would be the one who received the preview, but it seems clear that this is not the case. |
|
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1342 |
Well, Wackee definitely positioned himself in comments ;) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11418 |
lots of previous comments have been deleted on this one (unfortunately, there was some good drama =P).
and yes, if it was spread internally only before and then released into the public by uploading to csdb, whoever did it would be the releaser, whether he likes it or not. |
| |
bugjam
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 2610 |
But that is the point - wacek did apparently NOT get it internally, but FOUND it somewhere on a disk (which was publicly accessible). At least that is how I read it - I assume wacek can clarify. :) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11418 |
well thats not what the comments said before :=) |
