| |
Errazking
Account closed
Registered: Nov 2014
Posts: 14 |
Release id #165023 : Mazinger Z Preview +2D
ExCe5s, I do not know what to say, on the one hand I should congratulate you but the truth is that we have been a little disappointed with the speed with which you have released this crack.
Both Zub and I have released this beta of MAZINGER64 with the intention of being tested by the users of our small Hispanic community with the intention of receiving feedback...
Not for you to wear a medal without mentioning its origin or authors ...
We were working on an open beta that we thought we would soon upload to CSDb but now we do not know what to do |
|
... 10 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4720 |
Quote: Anyway, what I said yesterday, thanks Tim
Post the mods about it and we will look into it. I guess the reason is that it is a publically available preview, but I haven't looked into it. |
| |
Errazking
Account closed
Registered: Nov 2014
Posts: 14 |
The question is that yesterday I asked Excess to remove that version of the circulation waiting for one that we are finalizing, which I accept willingly and deeply appreciate ... and today we see that the mod has resurfaced without mediation on the other hand ...
I understand perfectly that the error was ours when uploading it to a public fórum (in which it is no longer available) exposing us to the cracks, which I do not quite understand why it resubmitted once the parties involved have agreed in this way |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11352 |
thats because csdb collects everything that was released. excess released that "crack" - it belongs to csdb. they cant retroactively unrelease something that is already circulating. |
| |
Errazking
Account closed
Registered: Nov 2014
Posts: 14 |
Ok, we understand your position, I hope you understand our |
| |
Tim
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 467 |
I'd feel better if a mod would answer complete, rather than Groepaz' half answer..
but nevertheless, my upload, my blame.. sorry Errazking. |
| |
Errazking
Account closed
Registered: Nov 2014
Posts: 14 |
We are more sorry, believe me |
| |
Moloch
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2924 |
Quoting Groepazthats because csdb collects everything that was released. excess released that "crack" - it belongs to csdb. they cant retroactively unrelease something that is already circulating. |
| |
Knight Rider
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 131 |
Looking at your 'beef' on Lemon64.com it is clearly a financial loss you believe you will suffer ? This is nonsense. The buyers are going to buy period. If anything you should be thankful of all this additional & free marketing that you are getting. Many people who have never heard of you, your organization or upcoming (crowdfunded) release now know about it.
Look at Jay Aldred and all the fuss he made about his preview and then tantrums about not releasing Galencia Preview [beta 3] it seems to have worked pretty well for him earning the 'game of the year' award from Return |
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3186 |
Members of cracking group whining about cracking scene, priceless.
Really, get over it, cracks happens, always. You can't stop it, and prolly they get available before the actual game release date.
As KnightRider already said, you only get free publicity from cracks. Whoever wants to buy, will do. Who don't buy, won't buy it anyway.
Just make sure to make a GOOD game. Sales would come if it's worthy, not if a crack it's spread or not. |
| |
Errazking
Account closed
Registered: Nov 2014
Posts: 14 |
The words written in Lemon are neither Zub nor mine, they are Danyquest founder of the Commodore64 club, who wants to give out this game and has found this situation.
I edit to point out that this post in Lemon has been deleted...
Situation of which we assume our part of fault, as I have already indicated in this post.
My opinion is already reading here, the point of Knigth Rider is out of place although you may be right that all advertising is welcome.
It was not our intention ...
Groepaz clarified the reason for the reload and Tim correctly answered my request, for my part there is no objection in the course of events ...
We paid the hazing for the uglylanders' rejoicing and that's it, that's all
And answering CooG, in that we are ... |
| Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |
