Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Feedback > Screenshot minimum size
2019-01-14 10:56
ChristopherJam

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1408
Screenshot minimum size

The recommended screenshot size is still given as 320x200, but given the number of releases that include the border either to show border effects or just to give the central area the same context as other releases, the few remaining new productions that use 320x200 now convey quite a misleading impression.

Could we bump the recommended (& minimum upload?) size to 384x272, and perhaps set a minimum size for the IMG element on the summary view so that old uploads are padded browser-side?
 
... 23 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2020-11-14 14:49
hedning

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4723
Quote: Quoting hedning
How hard would it be to implement correct aspect NTSC screenshots when making screenshots in Vice?
About as hard as implementing screenshots with PAL filter. =)


So they just didn't implement it, then, because reasons, I guess. Sad.
2020-11-14 15:47
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11364
The screenshot function in VICE is from ancient times, its a seperate render function, it doesnt know about "aspect ratio" or "CRT emulation" at all.

And of course PAL screenshots do not have correct aspect ratio either - only the error is less. And limiting the size to an exact pixel size is silly at best - the dimensions VICE uses are not set in stone, and someone using "full border" gets an equally valid - but different - output too.

edit: rewriting the screenshot feature is on the list of things todo after 3.5 release. at this point various new dimensions of screenshots will emerge.
2020-11-14 17:05
Six

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 293
To clarify, my comments above were regarding CSDB's limitation on screenshot sizes - I uploaded several that were (I'm assuming) culled by the system and they were directly from VICE. Since VICE is the de-facto standard for emulation, it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to have the site accept whatever it generates.
2020-11-14 17:12
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11364
Yeah, someone recently turned the "should" requirement into a "must" in his head and is on a mission. Doesn't make sense to me either.

Quote:

And of course PAL screenshots do not have correct aspect ratio either - only the error is less. And limiting the size to an exact pixel size is silly at best - the dimensions VICE uses are not set in stone, and someone using "full border" gets an equally valid - but different - output too.


to make that more clear: the screenshots currently use a pixel aspect ratio of 1:1. this is wrong in either case - the correct pixel ratio would be 0,75:1 for NTSC and 0,936:1 for PAL. ie a PAL screenshot should be 359 pixel wide instead of 384, NTSC should be 288 respectively. And even that is wrong, because the resulting image should be 4:3. And of course none of this would work with "no scaling" or "no filters" (you'd at least want double size or it will look terrible).
2020-11-14 22:02
Mace

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799
Geez, nit pickers!
I'm already happy when there's a screenshot in the first place (although most releases have them by now).

I'd rather have people use a proper pallet, instead of those bleeding eyes causing harsh neon-ish colours.
2020-11-14 22:58
hedning

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4723
Quote: Geez, nit pickers!
I'm already happy when there's a screenshot in the first place (although most releases have them by now).

I'd rather have people use a proper pallet, instead of those bleeding eyes causing harsh neon-ish colours.


+1
2020-11-14 23:01
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11364
Indeed :) It would also make a lot of sense to relax that rule to "must include full screen including borders" - as the actual pixel size doesnt really matter at all.
2020-11-15 03:01
wil

Registered: Jan 2019
Posts: 52
It's even worse for the C128 VDC releases. Exporting from VICE gives you 856x288 quadratic pixels, which means the image is 200% stretched in X.

Not that I would expect many releases for that mode though...
2020-11-15 17:12
ChristopherJam

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1408
Fair point about NTSC - and yes, it'd make sense to me to drop the minimum to 384x247 on that count.

I'm just (not) looking forward to the day I get around to releasing something that relies on chroma noise, and can't upload an accurate screenshot ;)
2020-11-15 17:22
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11364
like all those fine Mermaid pics? :)
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
MWR/Visdom
Higgie/Kraze/Slackers
kbs/Pht/Lxt
McGurk/Coma
Shake/Role
REBEL 1/HF
deetsay
Mason/Unicess
Alakran_64
Didi/Laxity
CreaMD/React
Guests online: 114
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.3)
Top Fullscreen Graphicians
1 Joe  (9.7)
2 Veto  (9.6)
3 Facet  (9.6)
4 The Sarge  (9.6)
5 Carrion  (9.5)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.054 sec.