| |
null
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 645 |
Adding screenshots for interlaced pictures - the proper way!
1) load picture in vice.
2) set maximum emulation speed to 10%
3) take 2 different screenshots
4) ???
5) profit!
the result is somehting like this:
( sure, it's not perfect, but at least it doesn't fool people because there are 2 blended images )
------------------------------------
http://zomgwtfbbq.info |
|
| |
assiduous
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 343 |
if blending adjacent frames makes a picture look better than it actually is then this makes a picture look horribly bad. i can count 5 fps in your example. |
| |
null
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 645 |
Quote: if blending adjacent frames makes a picture look better than it actually is then this makes a picture look horribly bad. i can count 5 fps in your example.
yes, but people can still watch in an emu. people often judge pictures by just checking a screenshot, which is not the way it should be done, as a picture looks fucking awesome, while in reality it flickers like hell.
------------------------------------
http://zomgwtfbbq.info |
| |
gregg
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 56 |
Several browsers, like Firefox, limit the minimum frame delay, that's why the above animation won't look right for many people.
At least it's better (read: less deceiving) than just blending the two frames together. |
| |
Deev
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 206 |
Quote: yes, but people can still watch in an emu. people often judge pictures by just checking a screenshot, which is not the way it should be done, as a picture looks fucking awesome, while in reality it flickers like hell.
------------------------------------
http://zomgwtfbbq.info
In reality (eg on a C64 going into a TV) they don't flicker like hell, that's reserved for viewing them in a web browser as an animated GIF :)
I also tried the same with Flash once, it still looked crap. |
| |
Sorex
Account closed
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 43 |
I did some testing with that ages ago aswell, Flash came out quite decent but it all depends on the picture ofcoz
http://sorex.is-a-geek.com//temp/interlacing.html |
| |
assiduous
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 343 |
the examples of Sorex are much closer to be acceptable |
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3054 |
Animated interlaced gif gives really mediocre results. But that Sorex's flash thingy is quite decent. |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5086 |
1. watch it on real shit.
2. blended images are closer than even sorex's stuff, which is nice but still misses the pal artefacts&blur&exact 50fps. |
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3054 |
/me agrees with Oswaldbogár. |
| |
WVL
Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 899 |
Quote: 1. watch it on real shit.
2. blended images are closer than even sorex's stuff, which is nice but still misses the pal artefacts&blur&exact 50fps.
But you could add pal artefacts & blurryness to each separate frame.
I actually like it :) (well, not that i like interlace at all very much..) |
... 15 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next |
