| |
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1762 |
Top list for added screen shots?
First of all, I respect that not everybody wants to take the time to add screenshots.
Personally I think it's nice to have them, even for text-tools and similar. I guess I'm a visual kind of person. :)
Anyway, to motivate people that are adding screenshots, could we have a top list of which people added the most screenshots on the statistics page?
|
|
... 25 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Nafcom
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 588 |
Quote: ...and *atleast* one credit. :) But maybe it would be better if you had to write a (damn good) reason for locking something, and if the reason wasn't good enough or the record seems incomplete the request would be rejected.
I locked my own group entries :)
*good reason* O:-) |
| |
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1762 |
Quote: ...and *atleast* one credit. :) But maybe it would be better if you had to write a (damn good) reason for locking something, and if the reason wasn't good enough or the record seems incomplete the request would be rejected.
Or maybe only locking possible for releases made in recent years? There are cracks from 1984 that I can't add screen shots to because of locking. |
| |
Nafcom
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 588 |
Quote: Or maybe only locking possible for releases made in recent years? There are cracks from 1984 that I can't add screen shots to because of locking.
Like I said, somebody could send me the files, I would add them :) |
| |
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1762 |
Quote: but in case of e.g. some groups, some people added wrong info when it wasn't locked.
If this was done with good intent it should be discussed and resolved in the forum.
If it was done with malicious intent the submitter should ofcourse be banned.
Maybe only moderators should be able to lock/unlock entries? |
| |
Nafcom
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 588 |
Quote: If this was done with good intent it should be discussed and resolved in the forum.
If it was done with malicious intent the submitter should ofcourse be banned.
Maybe only moderators should be able to lock/unlock entries?
I disagree: I suggest my way: My groups's entries are locked but I have added a member of us as mantainer, too |
| |
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1762 |
Quote: Like I said, somebody could send me the files, I would add them :)
Adding screenshot from the web interface is efficient, doing it by email is a pain. Thanks, but I haven't got the time. |
| |
Nafcom
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 588 |
Quote: Adding screenshot from the web interface is efficient, doing it by email is a pain. Thanks, but I haven't got the time.
if it's only a couple and not 100, I do not see what the problem is :)
just id 28737373 = 37373.png or something :) better than crying |
| |
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1762 |
Quote: if it's only a couple and not 100, I do not see what the problem is :)
just id 28737373 = 37373.png or something :) better than crying
Ok, we'll wipe our floods of tears and start mailing you.
|
| |
Nafcom
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 588 |
Quote: I think releases like that are mostly additions from beyond the birth of time, where CSDb only supported one screenshot size
That must be the reason why many recent releases still have crappy screenshots like latest Vandalism, right? ;) When did you support screenshot zooming, September, 2005? :D
Oh come on... |
| |
hollowman
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 474 |
Quote: Exactly. Incomplete entries or entries with invalid information would raise in CSDb? :(
do you think that pouet with its run for points has a bigger problem than csdb with incomplete entries, missing download links and such ? |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next |
