| |
Skylab
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 183 |
THE MOVERS Treasure Chest
Hi all ya guyz around here...
We've just started to open our Treasure Chest...
http://rapidshare.com/files/9304647/Hahni-Soft_of_WCS.ZIP.html
This first package are the transferred disks from Hahni Soft of WCS... WCS was just a local group. Jezi got later a member of Strike Force and Ruhrpott Cracker was also in the WCS (but actually we can't remember his handle at that time; we will add him then with his correct handle)...
signing off...
THE MOVERS [!] |
|
... 505 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829 |
Î personally use following:
Name of the Game +1 Hi Docs Fx Pw Solution [Lamer Group]
Name of the Demo [Even Lamer Group]
Name of the Magazine #01 [And even Lamer Group]
Name of the Tool v1.3 [The Super Group]
for unpacked files
and
e.g.
Name_of_the_Game+1HiDocsFxPwSolution_LAMERGROUP
for packed files
check the stuff on Gangsta's Paradise for further details |
| |
Jazzcat
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044 |
The first international standards from the Danish Gold 1987 party.
 |
| |
Mason
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 461 |
Quote: The first international standards from the Danish Gold 1987 party.
Yeah and those rules were genial. Mostly its the same standards who lived on through the scene, except the +FX were added and people used +3 instead of ++. |
| |
wreg
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 679 |
well i share your enthusiasm for this old machine :-)
what i cannot understand is your stubbornness ( sorry if thats too harsh ;-) ) towards some misunderstood naming standards... whats the use of your ancient one anyway nowadays?
i mean its ok for the name of the crack but not for the filename inside a 'higher' os! :-) you should not care how anyone names those .d64 or .zips, that has little to do with dg-standards, those standards were for internal c64 use, and thats basically all there is about it! :-)
mason, what is ccs2?!
i hope you dont mean ccs64v2.0. you are willing to skip a genius naming sheme, just because some software is not able to handle it?! ;-) |
| |
Skylab
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 183 |
You guys have any idea, who's the owner of that original piece of paper with the international standards???
Of course - THE MOVERS -
Stay rude, stay rebel...
[!] The Movers |
| |
Mason
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 461 |
Quote: well i share your enthusiasm for this old machine :-)
what i cannot understand is your stubbornness ( sorry if thats too harsh ;-) ) towards some misunderstood naming standards... whats the use of your ancient one anyway nowadays?
i mean its ok for the name of the crack but not for the filename inside a 'higher' os! :-) you should not care how anyone names those .d64 or .zips, that has little to do with dg-standards, those standards were for internal c64 use, and thats basically all there is about it! :-)
mason, what is ccs2?!
i hope you dont mean ccs64v2.0. you are willing to skip a genius naming sheme, just because some software is not able to handle it?! ;-)
Using weird letters for imports, fixes, hacks like smells bad of the Tosec Collection.
Sorry I do quality sorting and wont be put together with Tosec.
Besides that it wasnt me who decided the standard. I reckon Trazan told me that it was decided at some party. |
| |
wreg
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 679 |
i dont say the standard is bad.
its ok for the crack name but not useful nowadays to extend it to 'this standard also goes for .zip/.d64 files as well' :-)
besides, i want to inform you that i am not affiliated with tosec anymore, my collection is quality as well, i dont care about fast growing, its quality not quantity that counts ( i think we at least agree on this point :-)) )
and pls dont banish me just for using a variant of a naming scheme which originated at the emu/rom/whatever-scene :-)
using these weird letters is important for easy import to a real database! you will hopefully see what i mean in the future :-) |
| |
Trazan
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 620 |
(Thread is really not about namingstandards - ok :)) |
| |
Skylab
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 183 |
Right. Let's go back to the goal of that thread...
More disks from our side are coming up the next days...
[!] The Movers |
| |
Mason
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 461 |
Quote: i dont say the standard is bad.
its ok for the crack name but not useful nowadays to extend it to 'this standard also goes for .zip/.d64 files as well' :-)
besides, i want to inform you that i am not affiliated with tosec anymore, my collection is quality as well, i dont care about fast growing, its quality not quantity that counts ( i think we at least agree on this point :-)) )
and pls dont banish me just for using a variant of a naming scheme which originated at the emu/rom/whatever-scene :-)
using these weird letters is important for easy import to a real database! you will hopefully see what i mean in the future :-)
Exactly my point. It doesnt have anything to do with Tosec, but the naming looks exact like that it was Tosec.
For importing to a datbase Lexx/Yacc can handle that with my naming too.
Anyway its about packs not naming standards. |
| Previous - 1 | ... | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | ... | 52 - Next |
