| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4731 |
Release id #248202 : AIrrested
I'll help the moderators: Drama posts go here: |
|
... 47 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
CopAss
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 21 |
Quoting mankeliI BET PEOPLE IN 2025 WON'T EVEN WRITE THEIR OWN LOADERS AND CRUNCHERS ANYMORE!! AND THEY WILL USE PHOTOSHOPS AND WACOMS FOR PIXELLING
which is usually written in the credits, what they use...
the problem is with those who deny everything, citing their "talent". |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 275 |
Quote: Quoting mankeliI BET PEOPLE IN 2025 WON'T EVEN WRITE THEIR OWN LOADERS AND CRUNCHERS ANYMORE!! AND THEY WILL USE PHOTOSHOPS AND WACOMS FOR PIXELLING
which is usually written in the credits, what they use...
the problem is with those who deny everything, citing their "talent".
never gave credits to the guy who made the crunchers :( |
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 146 |
Yeah, loader author seems to be often credited. At one prod I tried to credit also music routine author, and the petscii editor author. But should I then credit the cruncher author, the assembler author (well that's easy because it's me :), or the text editor author? (some people even write those themselves - I have not yet) - VICE has been also pretty instrumental in making demo productions.
I'm of course exaggerating. I guess most of the authors just accept that they make the tools and people just accept that the tools are used and not credited. IDK. IDK also why I even try to quantize this. Somehow all this just reminds me of the "Zen and the art of Motorcycle Maintenance" which is a book of >400 words about the philosophy of "Quality".
Maybe in the end people just feel it's unfair that people are having different ways of working. Should I write my own Depth of Field shader, or do I accept that someone just uses the one written by Tim Sweeney? |
| |
Jetboy
Registered: Jul 2006
Posts: 336 |
We are all standing on the shoulders of Giants |
| |
Jetboy
Registered: Jul 2006
Posts: 336 |
btw. Should i make workstage generator to go with my converter to have complete package? |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 285 |
@mankeli:
All those credits you mentioned; assembler, text editor, plus there’s gotta be an OS underneath, all those things rely on FONTS to convey information. You also need to credit the typographer. ;-) |
| |
mankeli
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 146 |
Please don't. It's good that people post workstages, so that they can be used later to build even more advanced AI that actually pixels the images like a human would. And it's not good idea to use artificial training data ;) |
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2980 |
Quoting mankeliYeah, loader author seems to be often credited. At one prod I tried to credit also music routine author, and the petscii editor author. But should I then credit the cruncher author, the assembler author (well that's easy because it's me :), or the text editor author? (some people even write those themselves - I have not yet) - VICE has been also pretty instrumental in making demo productions. As for loader credits, that's part of the deal in my case - as in license agreement based on a 3-clause BSD-style thing.
(The fine print demands no prominent display, just a mention in a note on disk, a scroller, or somewhere in the upcrawl or so.)
But yes, the general question remains on whom to credit or not. If not otherwise specified, probably just up to the user's ideas about these things. |
| |
PAL
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 292 |
OK... it has come down to this: I shout out to every coder on the c64... Are you totally OK with the fact that you have to record everything live on video to make your part real and yours? Is that ok? That you have to record every step you do of the coding to make sure that some people on here will think it is ok to release? I am just asking for a friend. |
| |
Shine
Registered: Jul 2012
Posts: 368 |
BTT:
https://c64gfx.com/compo/2677 ;P |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 - Next |
