Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user Harvey ! (Registered 2024-11-25) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > THE 64™
2016-04-15 08:11
MagerValp

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1074
THE 64™

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-64-computer-and-handheld..

I don't suppose anyone know who the "world class software and hardware engineer" is, or the "technical team from around the world"? The page fails to mention any names besides Darren Melbourne.
 
... 116 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2016-04-17 10:46
tlr

Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1787
Quote: i very much doubt its an fpga based thing (RE: pricetag - and for HDMI you need something more powerful than the minimig, meaning more expensive too)

It all depends on the volume they are expecting. If not a minimig, it could be a Xilinx Zynq or an Altera Cyclone V SOC variant perhaps. Not too expensive compared to the case and keyboard I would imagine.

$150k worth of sales isn't that much though. They'll have to count in a lot more sales to make it float.

If they can pull it off before December all depends who is behind it and if they have assessed the complexity of the task correctly.

Awaiting more details...
2016-04-17 10:52
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11359
another thing that makes me very sceptic about it being FPGA - what core is it? making a halfway compatible core is a _LOT_ of work afterall (it takes many years). you can hardly make the hardware for those 150k, but pay a team of developers to work for, lets say a year? no way.
2016-04-17 11:13
tlr

Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1787
Sure. It probably requires the team to work for free on the promise of income based on future sales, like say royalties.

Given you have enough prior experience of the c64 and writing emulations of it, I think it could be feasible to implement in time, although very high risk.
2016-04-17 11:21
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11359
"Given you have enough prior experience of the c64 and writing emulations of it"
yeah - that again raises the question of "WHO?" =) they keep talking about how they have a high profile lineup and "people from the scene" yet fail to drop *any* names. shady =P
2016-04-17 11:24
tlr

Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1787
Agreed. The number of people that fit that category are a short list, especially if you add the aspect of working for free. If it really is an FPGA, maybe Gideon?
2016-04-17 11:45
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11359
certainly not, he is way too occupied with family (divorce) stuff - he can hardly keep up with 1541u things. Peter will not work for free (and he is bound to chameleon). Wolfgang and Mike (fpga arcade) will not do a core for a closed source project. that basically leaves none of the usual suspects left =P
2016-04-17 12:16
CreaMD

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3051
Quote: Agreed. The number of people that fit that category are a short list, especially if you add the aspect of working for free. If it really is an FPGA, maybe Gideon?

I'm sure Gideon has enough work with his own gadget.

And those specs look more like "wishlist" than actual technical specs. Which suggests, they weren't made by actual developer of the hardware.

I think this project needed a lot more preparation before going into "crowdsourcing" mode. I wonder what happens next, but so far, it looks very dubious (or shady as Groepaz said)
2016-04-17 18:50
MagerValp

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1074
I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, but those "Technical Specifications" basically confirm that they have no hardware. Unless they start naming names and showing working prototypes, stay far, far away.
2016-04-20 09:37
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11359
https://www.facebook.com/The64computer/posts/1536267333345169

*plop*
2016-04-20 09:53
Morpheus

Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 152
Hey guys,

I'm helping Retro Games Ltd to find people to create new games for the two new machines. I have no final say on what the machines will be like in the end, but I'm giving my suggestions of how to make a machine that both satisfies scene inhabitants and people that would buy the machines in retail stores.

And you can do that too! This was posted on the campaign page:

"The specifications for THE 64 ™ are not fixed at this point in time - we will be engaging with the community and customers over the coming months to deliver the best product we can! We want to hear from you guys what you want us to add!"

So, ask questions and give your suggestions on the companys' IndieGoGo campaign (http://tinyurl.com/zy2f8hw) or on their Facebook page (http://tinyurl.com/jnr7og9). Get in there and help shape the machines into something cool!

If anyone here is interested in creating new games for the machines and have a track record, please get in touch with me directly on andreas@andreaswallstrom.com.

Cheers!
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Mike
Teos
gorans
CopAss/Leader
Shake/Role
zscs
Didi/Laxity
Firehawk/Hoaxers
4gentE/ΤRIΛD
MWR/Visdom
Gold
Hairdog/BOOM!^Dream
Epyx/TSA
Guests online: 127
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
5 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
6 Mojo  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
10 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.2)
Top Crackers
1 Mr. Z  (9.9)
2 Antitrack  (9.8)
3 OTD  (9.8)
4 Fungus  (9.8)
5 S!R  (9.8)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.058 sec.