[CSDb] - User Forums - Release id #237341 : Future Ninja

Welcome to our latest new user Harvey ! (Registered 2024-11-25)

You are not logged in - nap

CSDb User Forums

Forums > CSDb Entries > Release id #237341 : Future Ninja

2023-12-05 11:22

hedning

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4721

Release id #237341 : Future Ninja

User Comment
Submitted by hedning [PM] on 5 December 2023
Frostbyte: I think it was that it ended up as #3 in a compo and also was the #1 pic on csdb for a while. People also cheered for it on fb etc. ”Amazing”, ”outstanding”, etc. Then artists react I’d say.

User Comment
Submitted by Moloch [PM] on 5 December 2023
10!

User Comment
Submitted by Frostbyte [PM] on 5 December 2023
Whereas I think it is great that this picture finally sparked a serious conversation about possibly clarifying the scene's unwritten rulebook what comes to declaring use of sources and converters and providing workstages, I do get Oswald's point, D-Mage may just not know about the unwritten rules.

What I find a bit strange is that THIS particular image sparked the conversation, as there are many well established, praised talents in the scene who so blatantly obviously use online sources for their images as well as very heavily rely on advanced converters, and never provide workstages, but with them most of the scene remains silent. Maybe it's about which group you're in? ;)

User Comment
Submitted by Bob [PM] on 5 December 2023
I am not an artist.. but I can't help it.. I like this image.. and it would do great in a demo too...

User Comment
Submitted by rexbeng [PM] on 5 December 2023
Most artists wouldn't care about AI; it's just another tool added to the plethora of tools that over the years made the random pics we are used to look at, be less and less 'art'. If it's just 'joes' you're after with your creations, say on youtube, why spent hundreds of hours to make a video about something specific that interests you, when a random video with cats will generate a hell of a lot more appreciation and views and need just a fraction of the time to make? Would an artist opt to make videos with more of the same cats for Youtube?

Work stages is a joke when the talk is about digital images, I trust anybody can understand that. :)

User Comment
Submitted by Carrion [PM] on 5 December 2023
6 months ago at X'23 I was giving the presentation about my process of creating C64 images. I showed how I use Photoshop to cut and paste pieces of images (found on Internet) to produce some quick results that I later take to Timanthes for long process of detailing. Also a big part of my presentation was my thoughts on using AI and how it is a huge temptation on using it as a shortcut to create C64 gfx, and how I feel tempted to use it (and I probably will).
What I stated back then was that every time I use AI I will inform about it in release notes or CSDB comments. I also declared that I will include workstages and/or the source .psd files and references if used.

The feedback after my presentation was very good and together with few pixel-artists we had really interesting conversation after it.
And... 6 months later... nothing happened.

Partially my fault because a) I wasn't that active this year, b) the images I created for CD demos haven't used AI and but...
c) seams to me that majority of people don't really care about AI and workstages and source files.
Or do they? Do you care?

So... IMO this conversation we have here is a great opportunity to maybe start a new "tradition" to share the references, AI prompts/models used, .psd files, workstages etc to make it fully transparent. I also strongly believe that this will be also a great way to share knowledge, learn, and have even more fun.
What you say? Who's with me?

One more thing regarding this and similar converted pics. It worries me same way as Hein, The Sarge, and others already said, but hey, let people do what gives them fun of using C64. Is it converting, pixeling, wireing. Scene will judge anyway.

User Comment
Submitted by 4gentE [PM] on 5 December 2023
Perhaps y'all remember what I was saying here when I was told I was being a drama queen.
https://csdb.dk/forums/?roomid=12&topicid=158776&showallposts=1
Just sayin...

User Comment
Submitted by Wile Coyote [PM] on 5 December 2023
@The Sarge 'Maybe he did all by himself?'

Lol! ..absolutely not.

User Comment
Submitted by hedning [PM] on 5 December 2023
For me it’s about honesty. Do what you like, AI or not, but when you are competing in a compo: hell no. It’s also obvious to me that most joes (Sorry Joe) can’t tell a convert from original work, which must be frustrating for most artists.

Using converted AI instead of converting a googled pic also makes the source impossible to find, which adds to the frustration. Even work stages could be forged ofc, working backwards. I am sure that already happened somewhere. It’s sad all of it.

User Comment
Submitted by The Sarge [PM] on 5 December 2023
I think it would be great if D-Mage could step in and add to the conversation. That would maybe stop the speculation of how this was made. Maybe he did all by himself? But until he doesn’t we will not know.

Looking at the image it’s obvious for me it’s converted. You see it in the mathematical dithering that is all over the image. For some reason the author decided to enhance the eyebrows so those are most surely hand pixeled but the rest of the image is probably not.
IF D-mage made this image from scratch by himself, ie painted the original on another medium and then used a converter to make it appear on the C64 then it’s fine. It’s still not hand pixeled but he is the author of the art. It’s just that the conversion itself takes away a bit of the “magic” of the pixel art. And it sure is a shortcut.

And this is what it all boils down to, shortcuts.
If you use AI or someone else art then it is a major shortcut. It’s such a big shortcut that you can’t really compare this to art that is done by someone by hand, from a life long period of training the mind and hand to realise your vision and ideas. It takes a lot of effort making those hand made pixel art that people will hopefully remember and appreciate. For me it’s up to 40-50 hours per image and maybe a week or two trying to come up with an idea that I think would work. Before that its has been a life full of failed attempts. The life of an artist, being it code, music or visuals. It’s all the same. We try, we fail, we fail better. Then comes AI and converting and cuts all this down to 10 minutes of work.
Of course we get upset, sad and worried.

For me C64 art is where my cradle was and hopefully it will be with me until I die. So I hate to see it devolve into soulless AI art.

So please be careful in your judgment of images.

User Comment
Submitted by Hate Bush [PM] on 5 December 2023
if it's done by the supposed creator AND converted by AI - then finished by hand - i see no problem with this.
i don't ask if a musician tapped the tune into tracker (which would be correct, true, scene-wise and so on) or did the whole tune in DAW as MIDI and then imported into tracker of choice (which would be... spitting on those who swear by first option?)

User Comment
Submitted by Hein [PM] on 5 December 2023
I really hope AI conversions don't become the norm in graphics competitions. I can't keep up with that. :) Anyhow, as a motive this isn't that exciting either.

User Comment
Submitted by Flex [PM] on 5 December 2023
I think people are worried. It's been in the air for some time now and in general, converts / AI at this level brings up big questions about the future.
Still, myself not even being the "spokesman" on this (emotional) topic I'm after some more transparency and if there's any spit on this work, that's only there for the method and the end result being this good. This might be hard to accept and I pretty much understand from the point of true craftsmanship.

User Comment
Submitted by chatGPZ [PM] on 5 December 2023
I'd rather see a decent convert than another half-assed "hand pixelled" image.

What *really* stinks are those half-assed converts that don't even look good.

User Comment
Submitted by Oswald [PM] on 5 December 2023
if your work is spit on, then you wouldnt feel anything personally ?

User Comment
Submitted by Flex [PM] on 4 December 2023
@oswald, I see nothing personal here. I'm hoping this launched compo will work as an eye-opener for the scene as it seems to me now that conversion / AI business is starting to gain too much ground.
I think converting is ok but trying to make people believe something else is not.
As a multicolour picture this one is ace.

User Comment
Submitted by Oswald [PM] on 4 December 2023
this is d-mage's first pic after 30 years, probably he is not familiar with the current unwritten rules in the scene, maybe more patience would have been better instead of making laughing stock of him in the form of a compo.

... 57 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....

2023-12-10 09:40

Krill

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2969

Quoting 4gentE

Following this logic, allow me a quick comparison, you’re basically saying we should allow athletes to use cyborg-like mechanical enhancements because, you know, they already don’t run bare foot, running shoes are a mechanical enhancement too, so what the heck. Or I misunderstood.

Well, as long as they won't outrun the slines... :)

"After Pistorius’ history-making run in 2012, the International Association of Athletics Federations (now World Athletics) ruled that, going forward, athletes using “mechanical aids” must provide evidence that their blades do not give them a competitive edge."

2023-12-10 09:48

4gentE

Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 210

Well, the guy has no legs (?!). But what do I know, maybe there are C64 artists with no arms.

2023-12-10 10:24

rexbeng

Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 35

My right arm is disabled as a result of motorcycle accident a good number of years back, when I was younger and horny and overconfident. I had to train myself to become left handed; luckily technology provides the means for me to at least not having to write on paper using a pen. :P

2023-12-10 10:38

4gentE

Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 210

Quote:

My right arm is disabled

There. I knew there had to be someone.
BTW I'll allow myself to say (and this is no mere courtesy) that you surely create some great art, no matter which arm you are using!

2023-12-10 10:51

Bitbreaker

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 504

Quoting 4gentE

Quote:
…once spoke against using Cross Assemblers…

I’ve heard this comparison before, and it is utterly wrong and misleading IMHO.

Exactly! If we take this to the code department, i would ask an AI to spit out optimized code for a new and great effect, and sell this as my own code (What would happen within minutes, compared to up to several years when coded by hand). How lame would that be? Tools can make life easier, but tools shall not substitute the whole process. It is like doping if you want to stick with the sports comparision. And here is also a good explanation why this happens, as humans love to cheat and sell shit for gold.
Basically using AI in that extend is selling someone else's ideas as your own.

2023-12-10 10:56

rexbeng

Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 35

Thanks. Art is the product of intellectual capacity though. Arms are just the primary human tools to materialize it. And although tools change or become unnecessary even; the intellect part remains untouched and drives advancements. That's how you distinguish an intellectual achievement from a merely technical one, no matter how the use of tools might make the latter seem impressive.

2023-12-10 11:17

4gentE

Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 210

@rexbeng
I couldn't agree with you more.
The thing is, I feel this LLM AI text-to-image toys are trying to substitute (or rather mimic) exactly the "intellectual" part of art creation instead of being "just another tool like hand, like pencil, like industrially produced oilpaint, like Photoshop". But I suggest We don't go further here, as you and I had a similar conversation in the past at some other forum.

2023-12-10 12:52

rexbeng

Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 35

@4gentE: Art will radicalize itself when it needs to, much like it happened numerous times in the past, so don't worry about it. :)

But this discussion is about the relation of the C64 scene with pixel pushing, and my mention of art being primarily an intellectual capacity was only to tell fellow sceners that if you want to judge the 'art' part of pixel images you have to start from that. To be able to read the picture, not stay at it's title and how the pixels are thrown. I guess that to many people this might sound very 'art institute', but it really is the only way to reward creators, and, yes, it's the only valid method for art professors to teach art students.

Take the 'future ninja' pic that started it all. How is this the image of a ninja? It could very well be a race driver, or a pilot. But not a ninja, because ninjas are supposed to need to be agile; therefore don't wear armor. So, in reality, it's a random face wearing a random helmet. You probably seen this thousands of times in real life, let alone medias. In your opinion, then, was this a product of outstanding intellectual activity? Nope. And it further seems half-done, because the dithering looks half-baked (/'wired'). 0/10 creativity, 5/10 technique. There!

BUT! There's another side to this coin. I'm choosing The Sarge because he is quite involved in this discussion and the example is recent. Take a look at Gimme Food. Now, take a look at the pic named Relax, that finished in 3rd place same compo. Let's write a very short description for what we see in each. 1) face of a cat asking to be fed, 2) a 'humanized' frog so relaxed that is taking a bath inside a pelicans beak.

2023-12-10 13:24

4gentE

Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 210

…And both of them outstanding examples you mention in the end paragraph are being fed to the AI machine as we speak, without authors’ consent, to be used in a way that in the future someone would not have to give any thought about how to visually express his/her ideas, to have the AI do it for him/her. And all that is colateral, real endgame being the big investors profit. Excuse moi dear people for personally being somewhat militantly against that.

2023-12-10 13:41

hedning

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4721

<Post edited by hedning on 10/12-2023 13:44>

My hope in these AI times is that things like craftmanship, artistry and skill in art will once again be something we look up to, 100 years after it got out of fashion through modernism and postmodernism. Perhaps AI stuff will be the poor man's soulless "art", and the elite will see it as the cheap mass produced kitsch it is, focusing on craftmanship by human hands instead. Hopefully we'll see the death of relativist postmodernism too, in the process. In my view postmodernism had driven the west away from truth, beauty, and into a anti-intellectual suicidal vortex potentially killing itself in the process. AI "art" is the emptiness of art that a postmodern world deserve.

Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 - Next

Refresh

Subscribe to this thread: