| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 2980 |
Release id #248155 : Hiking Home for Christmas
Drama posts go here: |
|
... 128 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts.... |
| |
Shine
Registered: Jul 2012 Posts: 369 |
My personal opinion is that I really enjoy working with colors and shapes. I've been doing it again since 2012 and actually just wanted to upload my old logos from 1989-1993. Then I got caught up in the fascination of designing logos again. In 2012 I "worked" with Paint Magic and CCS64, which was really annoying. Then in 2013 Pixcen from CRT and PETSCII from MARQ came along.
And yes... since then I've been fascinated by the C64 again.
This whole AI discussion is a bit pointless in my view. There will always be people who do without it altogether and there will always be other people who use it for their own purposes.
The reasons may be very different...
Personally, I just want to have fun with my hobby and if I were to "cheat" I would be lying to myself. Since I'm not wired like that and I abhor any kind of cheating (even in games, etc.), I certainly won't take away the joy of my hobby. But I firmly believe that everyone can handle it however they want. The only thing I would like is a little transparency, but that is not required.
(Google Translate, because my English ... .. .) |
| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009 Posts: 4732 |
It's one thing to make gfx for fun, which is of course what this is all about, but when competing with others in compos one should follow the rules in that compo, or else the compo is meaningless. Normally you expect original motifs and pixel work in gfx compos. In demos people will do wtf they want, as it's the total experience that counts there, be is with covers of known tunes or cool stuff from The Matrix or The Carebears. |
| |
Shine
Registered: Jul 2012 Posts: 369 |
@ Hedning:
I guess it will be very hard for the compo orgas to check, if AI was used or not...
And i guess also, that "Cheater" don't even care about rules. |
| |
Hein
Registered: Apr 2004 Posts: 954 |
Quoting BitbreakerI am observing those discussions for quite a long time. Some argue, that pixelling is all about fun. I'd say, if we are plain honest with ourselves, it is just half of the truth. Creation might be fun and there's also a goal behind creation, mainly presenting the result, earning praise and good votes or even winning a competition. I would love to ask, how much fun would it be, if you pixel those art just for your own, without ever showing it to someone else?
That said, how good are we at loosing and receiving feedback or critics? Can we accept it and reflect on ourself, or will we just start denying it and by that starting to defend ourselves? So in fact people hide a lack at certain skills, instead of being simply honest. This hiding leads to drama, to excuses, to cheating with worksteps, to insults and defending. That is, why i love a good portion of transparency on the creation process. With accepting that skills aren't well developed yet, one enters the chance of growth, with hiding that fact, one will stick to the old routine and never change, but keeping up the drama.
So becoming good, means to accept own failure first, which applies for all cetegories, not only gfx.
Imo, the paradox here is, if we don't share our creations, nobody cares about the process, only ourselves. |
| |
Dano
Registered: Jul 2004 Posts: 234 |
Honestly i give a proper fuck from where the motive or the work originates.
For me what counts is if the result is pleasing.
Why is it that much of a problem if people use the tools we got nowadays and take shortcuts where possible?
Where to draw the line of what is cheating? Already if a tool of sorts takes over the dithering and color reduction?
To me it can already be art and works if one writes a proper prompt for an AI of choice.
Is it cheating when i use ChatGPT a sparring partner when coding?
To me it's lame when somebody pulls off a straight conversion of an image without really putting effort into it.
But is it lame to composite assets into a new composition? I've seen works on the internet which are really cool, esspecially what the source material was.
We are in a time where tools can aid our work in many different ways. Even more and more sophisticated than putting a grid paper over a picture.
Seriously guys, be happy when people create something you find appealing in one way or another.
How good something is various from one to another. Don't blame people for being clever and achieve something in less time another person would. |
| |
Shine
Registered: Jul 2012 Posts: 369 |
About "Cheating":
Only I decide for myself what "cheating" means in my graphics. For everyone else, "cheating" may mean something different. |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021 Posts: 285 |
Honesty. Please be honest. It costs you nothing. Yet it grants you freedom. It helps you breathe deeper. Use whatever you like using. Just be honest about the process. What’s to lose?
In this aspect, for example Jetboy and Carrion are my absolute heroes. |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004 Posts: 275 |
good that time passed by, and we are using xassemblers and other pc tools. i would say without those helpful little helpers 80% of the current parts of the top demos would not exist. |
| |
Shine
Registered: Jul 2012 Posts: 369 |
Do new/modern tools justify the "simple" conversion of images, with negligible effort? (Esp. in Graphics Compos) |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004 Posts: 275 |
Quote: Do new/modern tools justify the "simple" conversion of images, with negligible effort? (Esp. in Graphics Compos)
i will recognize such work and build my opinion. on a party, i would vote like it deserves in my opinion ;)
let the people use ai. i dont care much. so, yes, let them use ai \O/
i would never thou speak out which persons i think use AI or any other helpful tools. unlike some of you guys are trying to blame others in public even without proofs.
if its realy important to you guys, then teach the masses how they can recognize AI converts. |
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 - Next |