| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2980 |
Release id #248155 : Hiking Home for Christmas
Drama posts go here: |
|
... 128 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 285 |
Quote: jesus, stop this already. the website is trash and gives false positives.
And now someone will come along and say that I repeat myself. Have you experimented at all or you’re just pulling this out of your you know what? Plus, el jefe observed the same result as me. And it’s this: In my experiments the website DOES NOT give false positives. In fact NOT ONE. |
| |
Higgie
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 127 |
I think it could be useful to integrate the sightengine.com API with CSDb, Though I doubt there would be someone willing to do the work.
Maybe Raistlin could use it on c64gfx.com. It's free for up to 2000 API-calls a month (max. 500 per day). That should be sufficient for the amount of gfx-releases we currently have.
It would be a nice additional feature, I think.
And as long as sightengine doesn't produce false positives, no one should be worried about getting flagged wrongly.
People who endorse AI anyways shouldn't be worried at all, as it would be just an additional indicator. Nothing to be ashamed of.
For the rest of us, it might just give that extra bit of information that we would like to get from an artist. But this way the artist doesn't have to be involved in providing that info - to take into account the concerns expressed by Pal. No additional work required that might hinder the creative process.
What do you think? |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
<img>https://i.imgflip.com/9dr1pd.jpg</img> |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 285 |
@Higgie:
Of course, the website should be tested more thoroughly. In my limited experiments it produced zero false positives, but I haven’t experimented enough to reach something really conclusive. |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
 |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 285 |
@Oswald:
I think I told you this once before. Maybe I forgot. Here it goes. Please rewatch the “Spanish inquisition” Python sketches. Because you’re making a fool of yourself. You’re using it wrong, like you don’t understand them, but only laugh at them yelling the “Spanish inquisition” part. The sketches are exactly about someone yelling “What’s this? A spanish inquisition?” when confronted with the most benign and normal questions. You’re welcome. |
| |
CopAss
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 21 |
it's sad that fair play is so fucked up.
it's more important to shout "let the creation be free", "respect the way I create" and other bullish clichés!:D
it's pathetic that they refer to why I have to prove anything, I'm an "ARTIST"...
thank you AI, this is a new world.
in real life, if someone is "caught" cheating or "just suspected of it", then their "career" is over!
how strange that those who use AI have been so fucking talented since 2021. |
| |
Higgie
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 127 |
Quote: @Higgie:
Of course, the website should be tested more thoroughly. In my limited experiments it produced zero false positives, but I haven’t experimented enough to reach something really conclusive.
of course! |
| |
Higgie
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 127 |
@Oswald:
It would have been sufficient if you had simply posted the text. That wouldn't have made your post any more relevant, but it would have cost us a little less data volume. ;)
(I sometimes long for the days of the old BBS networks, where users who posted too much binary data were regularly banned.) :-D |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 285 |
@CopAss:
Yes, we are now living in the post truth world. The truth is deliberately being obfuscated by noise. Sadly, some people mistake this sabotage of truth for freedom. Some of them even imagine they will extract some petty benefit from this development. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 - Next |
