| |
JCH
Registered: Aug 2008
Posts: 200 |
SID Factory II
Laxity and I have decided to go BETA with SID Factory II to let all curious SID composers also have a go at this cross-platform SID editor.
We have a Facebook group that you are welcome to join. There's also a nifty user manual there. If you're not on Facebook, this thread should serve as another place where we can share questions, ideas, music, bugs, new builds, additional files, etc.
Please note that although SID Factory II is quite stable and more than capable of editing SID tunes at this point, it is still missing a few essential things such as e.g. sub tunes. We have a solid ToDo and will post new builds here as they become available.
The first official BETA build: SIDFactoryII_20200604.zip |
|
... 145 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Laxity
Account closed
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
Thanks :)
I guess I can change it to v2 still, right?
What I did was look at what Cadaver provided with Goat, so I thought that was good enough for Jazz (except I got the license text from the interwebs). Contact info in form of physical address or email sufficient?
Driver sources aren’t required to run the software, and is more like a plugin. Drivers will be included later too. I guess from the next build we might have it where it makes sense. I would be surprised if that is a requirement, but hey - I know nothing about this stuff.
Would be great if you tried building for Linux. If you need any assistance, please let me know.
Thanks for the help so far. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11510 |
Quote:I guess I can change it to v2 still, right?
If you want to get really anal about it... technically the one you released is now GPL v3 licensed. BUT - since you are the only author, you can always re-license it (This becomes a lot more difficult once you accept contributions from other ppl). So yes, you can do it :)
Quote:Contact info in form of physical address or email sufficient?
email, or even a website with a contact form, is fine.
Quote:Driver sources aren’t required to run the software, and is more like a plugin. Drivers will be included later too. I guess from the next build we might have it where it makes sense. I would be surprised if that is a requirement, but hey - I know nothing about this stuff.
This topic can become *really* difficult, i have usually solved it in the past by simply providing all source :) This "plugin" debate is something ppl in the community have been arguing about quite a bit in the past - the general consensus seems to be that: when your host program and the plugins are the only existing combination (the plugins can be used in exactly one host programs), this is no different to linking them into the binary, with all implications (ie GPL "infection"). But i'm not a lawyer.... it's something to consider however. This restriction exists so you cant "break" GPL by just compiling all GPL code into "plugins" and load it dynamically into your program. |
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3236 |
> I feel a bit like I've put out my dirty underwear for show.
Oh don't worry, there is a niche market for that kind of fetish too. :D |
| |
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1807 |
Quoting Groepaz- The source seems a bit "naked" to me. Depending on which GPL version you choose, you will have to provide everything required to build from source (that includes project files etc). also binary blobs like the driver .prg files can be a problem, those may require source too (with v3 i think this is a must, but it would be really nice in any case).
The .prg binaries are in a grey area IMO. Is there really always source for included firmware? e.g microcode, CPU management engine, WIFI chipset code, etc...
That said, it would be really nice to have source for that as well. :)
Quoting GroepazSo - is anyone already looking into creating makefiles for linux? If noone else does, i will look into that, perhaps this weekend.
Please do! :) |
| |
Laxity
Account closed
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
Quote: Quoting Groepaz- The source seems a bit "naked" to me. Depending on which GPL version you choose, you will have to provide everything required to build from source (that includes project files etc). also binary blobs like the driver .prg files can be a problem, those may require source too (with v3 i think this is a must, but it would be really nice in any case).
The .prg binaries are in a grey area IMO. Is there really always source for included firmware? e.g microcode, CPU management engine, WIFI chipset code, etc...
That said, it would be really nice to have source for that as well. :)
Quoting GroepazSo - is anyone already looking into creating makefiles for linux? If noone else does, i will look into that, perhaps this weekend.
Please do! :)
A shit. It tried to reply on the underwear comment. :)
Those are prgs that you can load on any c64, emulator and now also sid factory. Those files just provide at chunk of meta-data the editor can interpret. |
| |
JCH
Registered: Aug 2008
Posts: 200 |
I have now replaced GPL v3 with v2 in all SF2 archives at the blog, including the one with source codes.
The file included is the plain text version I found here. |
| |
Laxity
Account closed
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
Awesome, buddy. :) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11510 |
I couldnt resist... i have it running natively. I had to add a couple missing includes here and there, and provide a platform file. Will fix the mess i made a bit and then post a link, stay tuned :) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11510 |
So yay, here it is.... Linux binaries (NOT statically linked with SDL2): http://hitmen.c02.at/temp/SIDFactoryII_Linux_20200718.zip
Source with Makefiles and additions required to compile on Linux:
http://hitmen.c02.at/temp/SIDFactoryII_Source_20200718_Makefile..
Included is a really quick and dirty makefile (and completely untested variants of it for msys and macos), and a .patch file which has all the changes in it, so you can review and copy/change those files in your sourcetree (or just copy over the changed files. i only added a few missing includes, plus added platform files for linux)
If you merge all those things, in the future the only eventually still needed changes for linux will touch the makefile or the platform files.
cheers :) |
| |
Laxity
Account closed
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 459 |
Wow.. that was quick. Thank you! |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 16 - Next |
