Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > C64 Composing > Stupid Hardrestart...
2006-07-11 12:55
Bamu®
Account closed

Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332
Stupid Hardrestart...

A question to all msx-player coders.

Why 99% of all players have a completely worse hardrestart???
I only know a few (not more than 5) which owns a really HARD = good sound-restart.
With every other player it's impossible to create modern/up-to-date instruments.

I think there are some nice editors (with nice interfaces) out there, but the completely outdated hardrestart destroys everything. :(

So, any explanation for this?
 
... 92 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2006-07-13 12:04
CreaMD

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3053
Quote: Maybe the heart of the matter is: why go around badmouthing editors of the past (with obviously limited features), why reveal how intolerant & limited your taste is, why not just stick to the editors you like and make the music you like :)

Exactly!
2006-07-13 12:07
CreaMD

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3053
Quote: Surprisingly not every Cane & DOS tune was composed in the sosperec editor.... :)
I guess they used Chubrocker. It's easy to recognize these songs since the quality of the instruments is (in comparison to sosperec) quite low. :P

---

Anyway, polished sounds are a MUST for me.
I attached here 3 examples to show what can be done with GOOD hardrestart:

Example1:
- Listen to the 'polished' drums. (Uses hardrestart)
- Arpeggios doesn't use hardrestart

Example2:
- Every instrument uses hardrestart

Example2:
- For the bass sound I disabled the whole hardrestart.


http://rapidshare.de/files/25726672/examples.rar.html

---

@jeff
Yes I agree! A combination of both makes it sound cool! (no hardrestart & hardrestart)
However, it's nothing special to do cool musics without hardrestart. (bug free)
The only thing to remember: Careful usage of ADSR values. :)


I doubt any musician here will be interested. *Your music is what defines you...* opinions, definitions, claims and complaints are irrelevant.
2006-07-13 12:13
Bamu®
Account closed

Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332
@creamd
Feel free to have doubts... :P
2006-07-13 22:43
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1160
@Laxity: now I think I understand one more of the methods listed in ATMDS docs:

T minus 2 (or more?): gate off
T minus 1: ADSR to $0F0F, oscillator reset if needed
T minus 0: Init note

According to my experiments this is a quite forgiving HR that lets one use full sustain, write order doesn't really matter, and it never bugs horribly. On the flipside, attack of new note may vary according to the previous note's ADSR setting.

2006-07-14 08:40
Bamu®
Account closed

Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332
Quote: @Laxity: now I think I understand one more of the methods listed in ATMDS docs:

T minus 2 (or more?): gate off
T minus 1: ADSR to $0F0F, oscillator reset if needed
T minus 0: Init note

According to my experiments this is a quite forgiving HR that lets one use full sustain, write order doesn't really matter, and it never bugs horribly. On the flipside, attack of new note may vary according to the previous note's ADSR setting.



Hmmm? ADSR to $0F0F ??? Doesn't this produce bad/choppy restart?

---

@Cadaver
Yes, the sosperec is DUR. based. I have no clue why, but somehow I like it. Anyway, composing music with DUR. cmd's isn't fun. :I
2006-07-14 09:18
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1160
@Nata: It's not the same as if you put $0F0F to GT's HR ADSR parameter. The timing of the frames is different, and there's no gated on silent first frame (wave $09).
2006-07-14 12:13
Bamu®
Account closed

Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332
Quote: @Nata: It's not the same as if you put $0F0F to GT's HR ADSR parameter. The timing of the frames is different, and there's no gated on silent first frame (wave $09).

Ahaaa! Ok! :)
2006-07-14 14:33
Bamu®
Account closed

Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1332
@cadaver

How $0F0F will sound (not in GT)?
I THINK it doesn't produce a *quality* HR... or maybe? Cadaver?
Which editors use $0F0F ?
2006-07-14 14:42
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11362
all methods have their ups and downs. there isnt THE hardrestart.
2006-07-14 15:11
cadaver

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1160
$0F0F is in DMC4 I think.

We can define "the" hardrestart as what is pleasing to nata. ;)

But yeah, "quality" hardrestart doesn't quite fit when the screen is depicting sodomy or other such acts ;) Maybe when/if there are robots performing it, but even then it's a stretch..
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Lotus/Ancients
Hein
Magic/Nah-Kolor
KEF
Higgie/Kraze/Slackers
sln.pixelrat
Jope/Extend
2bt
Da Snake
Strepto/Lethargy
Guests online: 99
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
7 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Libertongo  (9.5)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Morph  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Nostalgia  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.2)
Top Swappers
1 Derbyshire Ram  (10)
2 Jerry  (9.8)
3 Violator  (9.7)
4 Acidchild  (9.7)
5 Cash  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.044 sec.