| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2980 |
Release id #248155 : Hiking Home for Christmas
Drama posts go here: |
|
... 128 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
CopAss
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 21 |
how I vote:
#1 composition: most important, if it's bad then the picture won't interest me. the essence of a good composition is to generate emotions.
if it's cliché then I won't interest.
I don't look at the implementation at this time.
#2 implementation: what gets to this point will definitely not be under 6 points.
here I look at the colors, the technique. |
| |
Higgie
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 127 |
This is how I vote:
I find Sanders' set of indicators quite useful to rate an image.
I must admit, however, that first impressions are already effective before I apply the parameters mentioned. This first impression determines whether I even take a closer look.
Direct conversions or AI receive a -10 penalty in my ratings (usually normalized to one point based on the scale provided), regardless of what other indicators would suggest at first glance.
BTW:
I must say, however, that this explanation of my voting behavior has significantly slowed down my creative flow. I believe that it is fundamentally unnecessary for me to explain my voting behavior here. After all, I am free and I fear that this explanation could reduce the magic of my votes. :-D |
| |
Shine
Registered: Jul 2012
Posts: 369 |
Well,
i vote ONLY 9 or 10, if i like something and seldom a 8 when people are beginners (to motivate them).
SERIOUS VOTING SERIOUSLY? Well, ... .. .
To make a science about voting on CSDb is really weird! Sorry! |
| |
CopAss
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 21 |
Quoting ShineWell, i vote ONLY 9 or 10, if i like something and seldom a 8 when people are beginners (to motivate them).
If someone rightfully gets a lower score from me and if they can overcome the "hist", they will learn from it.
If I give them a higher score, I lie to them and they believe it's good.
By doing so, I only do them harm. |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
 |
| |
Higgie
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 127 |
@Shine:
It's less of a science but rather reflecting on what you think when you vote for something. At least that's how I would call it.
edit: I think Oswald is just thinking about what lame meme he might come up with next. ;) |
| |
Hein
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 954 |
Quoting 4gentETry wrapping your minds around this. These are the facts....
As far as I can see, facts, recent gfx compos (Fjälldata, Zoo, Transmission, ...) are still listing the same old hardcore tops. Not sure who's been chasing who?
As for rating, never been that academic about it, and I don't vote, but the originality / theme / concept seems to be most important to me. The style, composition and technique are usually a matter of the artist's persistence, compulsive behaviour and stamina. Which I respect alot, great art never comes easy, but I don't think it's the most surprising factor for me.
AI doesn't do well on originality, mind, only when it's a funny generated meme that makes me laugh. But I guess that's also depending on the person who's typing in the fucked up prompt. :P |
| |
Higgie
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 127 |
Quote:
@Oswald: When I look at the notebook in the background, the cat must be long gone. (R.I.P.) |
| |
4gentE
Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 285 |
@Hein:
I meant (and wrote) how the graphicians were chased away from the discussion, how it seems they've been silenced. Not that they ceased releasing. I hope it doesn't get to that.
But perhaps we should all go away and leave Harry and Lloyd to exchange memes they fail to understand and laugh like crazy. |
| |
CopAss
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 21 |
Quoting 4gentE Not that they ceased releasing. I hope it doesn't get to that.
Some people are only submitting pictures for 3 parties next year... |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 - Next |
