| |
Didi
Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 479 |
Release id #240239 : Uridium +7DH [any drive fix]
This should not be marked as re-crack this time IMO because it still contains everything from the Remember version, just adds the drive number fix to the hi-saver. Previous releases from him were missing things and credits to the original work. |
|
... 1 post hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Matt
Registered: Apr 2014
Posts: 2 |
Thank you, all my work are peanuts, but helpfully too.
THese are Fixes !!!
Quality work, lasted 5 weeks.
Done in spare time.
I hope to do some further work. |
| |
TheRyk
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 2076 |
I admit that "morally" there's a difference between
a) fixing existing cracks while leaving original credits intact (which seems true for the release in question) and
b) pretending to have cracked sth but in fact only introslapping other people's work
Moral and quality do not matter for defining database categories, though.
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. Though I recall we talked about definitions over and over here on the forums, manipulating an existing crack instead of cracking sth yourself, _IS_ recracking. And if anyone doing it feels bad about being told so, well, just get an original and crack it from scratch.
Flagged it "Import" for the time being... though I'm aware, that the discussion about that category wasn't much less controversial than about re-cracks. |
| |
Fungus
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 623 |
Since original intro and etc is on it, I agree with calling it an import and not a recrack. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11130 |
It's even less of an import than a recrack though :) |
| |
Fungus
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 623 |
Well importing died with the internet, what else do you want to call it when there is no new tags being made. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11130 |
Doesn't really matter what i want to call it. What would matter is the definition for what either "Import" or "Recrack" means in this database.
Not that it will ever be defined :) |
| |
Raistlin
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 570 |
Wouldn’t a recrack just be an unauthorised additional crack, with or without attribution? If permission is given, it could be a “co-op”?
Like, I’ve noticed that when a group releases a broken crack (which has been common for certain groups in recent years), the other groups aren’t just re-cracking those and fixing it. |
| |
Fungus
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 623 |
Oh come on groepaz, recrack is theivery and the person doing that is generally regarded as an ass and lamer.
Fixing bugs in cracks from people who are retired isn't the same thing at all. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11130 |
That doesn't change what i said, at all. See the definition for "crack" in this database. |
| |
Fungus
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 623 |
Well I am not interested in what this db terms what things are because it can't be changed and is often inaccurate. That was the whole point of discussing the tags and stuff. The database can be better, but it never will be if it can't be changed... |
| Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |
