Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user Coinoperator ! (Registered 2024-06-17) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Discussions > Dim cold calculation?!?!?!
2002-08-25 22:41
CreaMD

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3036
Dim cold calculation?!?!?!

Okay.. I have to say something about the thing which really bugs me now. It's a sentence taken from review of Singles Collection. Here we go: "a dim, coldly calculated concept made for the due of things. Sadly enough all too recent as demands for not letting the stream dry up completely".


Dear critic.. Please don't tell us that you know what we feel when we compose, draw and code. Are you really so desperately incompetent that you really believe that people like TMR, Hollowman and others who participated in the project produce things because they desperately want the stream (another stupid catch word from that cathegory where retro & oldskool belongs) to continue?? Oh man, wake up.. nobody needs to do anything. If those people didn't enjoy what they did, they would never do anything. Please don't tell us that creative people do things because they want to keep c64 alive. I don't think anybody who participated on production of the collection did that with this purpose, only you are so incompetent that you dare to present daemagogy as fact. My god, dude those words you said are naiver than any retro bafflegab I've ever read on lemon64.com forums or comp.sys.cbm. And this from person who is actively participating in the C64 scene. Please go spread your incompetent and daemagogical definition of scene productivity somewhere else than in the most prestigious magazine ever produced.


Ah.. by the way.. according to your definition Vandalism News is a cold calcualtion too.. just to keep scene alive? Yeah?. If you believe in your own words, you already consider scene dead. Scene(rs) doesn't think and analyse things just for the sake of thinking and analysing things like you do.. Sorry but scene(r) is not so simple like you try to present to us. If there is just one person who understands the scene(rs), please stand up and say. Yeah, that's me. .... silence... have a nice dream dude.
 
... 60 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2004-06-16 21:46
Jazzcat

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044
I've witnessed CreamD arguing with many sceners who used to be on the C64 in the past. It's almost as if he feels threatened by them. I have no idea what goes on in his head that make him as "hot blooded" as he is.

CreamD: can't you just react calmly to Crossfire instead of going off the 'deep end' all the time?

As for online articles of Vandalism News to the C64 News Portal - I disagree. We want to advertise a disk magazine for people to read on C64 (or in an emulator even) - not a "related" C64 production that is not actually made on the C64.


2004-06-16 22:14
CreaMD

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3036
Quote: I've witnessed CreamD arguing with many sceners who used to be on the C64 in the past. It's almost as if he feels threatened by them. I have no idea what goes on in his head that make him as "hot blooded" as he is.

CreamD: can't you just react calmly to Crossfire instead of going off the 'deep end' all the time?

As for online articles of Vandalism News to the C64 News Portal - I disagree. We want to advertise a disk magazine for people to read on C64 (or in an emulator even) - not a "related" C64 production that is not actually made on the C64.




As far as the first part of the message is concerned. I've got into argument with Radar, now with Crossfire (I don't count rrr back in.. hm.. 97? ;-). If I forgot anyone feel free to remind me I'll add a score on my right shoulder. Maybe you mix my arguments about cracking with Taper and you into the same cathegory, but they aren't.

"As for online articles of Vandalism New..."

I know...

2004-06-16 22:18
Crossfire
Account closed

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 221
It sort of explains the whole cha-bang... Fine.. And just to reply to your question, CreaMD: Sure I could, but to be honest I'm bored out of my mind with this lameass discussion, so there..
2004-06-17 01:05
Jazzcat

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1044
Crossfire: The intensity of arguments hasn't been the same since around 1996. There is now just useless squabbels and bickering never amounting to much.

It's a pity, as back in the past people were more energetic and more interesting! Has the WWW made people this boring?

2004-06-17 09:17
Puterman
Account closed

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 188
The WWW not only makes people less energetic and interesting, it can also make you fat, give you cancer and HIV, turn you into a drug addict (if you're not one already), make you lose your hair, break your back, raise beer prices to ridiculous amounts, refuse to mowe your lawn, steal your medicine when you're sick, make all your old favorite tunes sound like shit (yes, even Iron Maiden!), hide all your clean socks, make holes in the soles of your shoes on a rainy day, give you explosive diarrhoea and, finally, turn you into a nerd. Yes, it could happen to _you_.
2004-06-17 10:46
Crossfire
Account closed

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 221
Quote: Crossfire: The intensity of arguments hasn't been the same since around 1996. There is now just useless squabbels and bickering never amounting to much.

It's a pity, as back in the past people were more energetic and more interesting! Has the WWW made people this boring?



Jazz: Well, like we both know the cracking scene and the demo scene always were two very different things. The cracking scene was a direct competition (especially the pointhunting in the 90ies *LOL*), while the demo scene may be competitors but in a completely different way...and now there's no cracking scene left, so I guess that explains it.. But to be honest, I don't miss it, I just found it a bit funny this discussion was being put in the same box as "ragging", cause that's not how I remember it. ;-)

Puterman: You actually contracted HIV over the net? Wow, must have been one hell of a pornsite ;-) *LOL*
2004-08-07 16:56
Metal Maniac

Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 12
Pornsite ? Where ?
;)

Is this thread about Singles Collection ? Didn't I do a part for that ? Cool, wonder what the thread was all about ;)

Crossfire,
greetings pal, I just read some swappingletters from you I found when I were at my parents place cleaning out their place as they are moving. Cool that I saved some of that old stuff!
2004-08-09 12:16
Crossfire
Account closed

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 221
Hey MM, sure has been a long time ;-)
2004-08-10 19:55
Metal Maniac

Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 12
Yeah, its nice meeting you (and alot of other lamers, oh I man pals) over here.

Are you active on C64 in someway ?

I am. Lol.
2004-08-12 07:18
Crossfire
Account closed

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 221
Not since like 1998 or 1999, nope *G* Just hanging around here for the sheer fun of it....although out of the scene, one is still curious, you know ;-)
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
The Human Co../Maste..
Smasher/F4CG
TheEnemy/TREX/THD
A3/AFL
Majikeyric
WVL/Xenon
Guests online: 120
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.7)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
5 Edge of Disgrace  (9.7)
6 No Bounds  (9.6)
7 Uncensored  (9.6)
8 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
9 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
10 Aliens in Wonderland  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
3 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
6 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
7 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
8 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
9 Birth of a Flower  (9.5)
10 Quadrants  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Nostalgia  (9.4)
2 Oxyron  (9.3)
3 Booze Design  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 SHAPE  (9.3)
Top Logo Graphicians
1 Sander  (9.9)
2 Facet  (9.5)
3 Mermaid  (9.4)
4 Pal  (9.4)
5 Shine  (9.3)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.037 sec.