| |
ptoing
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 271 |
VIC20, +4, C16 and so on
I think it would be nice to have all Commodore 8 bit machines on the CSDb, it might even generate more demos and stuff for the less common systems. |
|
... 188 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Hein
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 954 |
I'm in favour of no. 4 category as well. I'd also like to see about demos/cwacks released on other Commodore 8 bit machines (PET etc). These releases don't get as much attention as C64 releases and can be inspiring to some. |
| |
Tao
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 115 |
I'm in favour of option 4 and dead set against options 5 + 6. |
| |
ptoing
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 271 |
I favor 4,3,2 in that order. |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 677 |
my ranks:
3
2,4
1
|
| |
cadaver
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1160 |
Ah well, could tell my opinion too instead of inserting just random sarcastic remark: since there's already C128, DTV, SuperCPU etc. stuff here anyway, and going more puritan at this point doesn't seem worth enforcing, I'd be in favor of 4) too |
| |
drake
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 207 |
no. 4 seems a good one IMO.
|
| |
Graham
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 990 |
@Mace: You can put me to 4. I am not opposed to +4 on CDDb although I think it's links to C64 are weaker than those of the VIC20. |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
(Hopefully you all understand that I'm merely collecting votes here. I am not at all part of the "1337" behind CSDb ;-) ) |
| |
Luca
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 178 |
Ok, Luca prefers options 1 and 4. |
| |
yago
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 333 |
3 is my favorite, 2 is the harsh reality, and 1 would be a backstep.
dunno if +4 folks are interested in 4, but instead of 5 and 6, people can just write links in their trivia.
just my 0.02
|
| Previous - 1 | ... | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | ... | 20 - Next |
