[CSDb] - User Forums - Release id #205568 : Spindle 3.0

You are not logged in - nap

CSDb User Forums

Forums > CSDb Entries > Release id #205568 : Spindle 3.0

2021-07-05 11:31

Bitbreaker

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 508

Release id #205568 : Spindle 3.0

Let's continue this here :-)
So the kernal + basic suits 10 times on a disk in your case and the FLI 12 times. I just tried that and the kernal+basic fits 12 times on disk, and still quite a few blocks left, so there's more than 105 blocks extra on disk. The FLI fits 15 times on a disk and still some blocks free, so that is an extra of 126 blocks minimum. Speed was 6,11kb/s for the kernal and 8,05kb/s for the FLI at 100% cycles for the CPU.
Seeing that you cache a second sector, are you making use of a 512byte window now or still using a 256 byte window per block?

... 10 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....

2021-07-09 00:27

Krill

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2982

Quoting lft

Hmm, that's quite a big difference. Yes, I did use LoadNext. Let's compare notes in PM.

Would it be possible to publish the benchmark's disk images and source?

I'm adding it to my loader's example folder (as i did with the Bitfire/Sparkle benchmark described in Loader Benchmarks) but would like to avoid reinventing the wheel and possibly skewing/biasing results. =)

Previous - 1 | 2 - Next

Refresh

Subscribe to this thread: