Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user lotus_skylight ! (Registered 2024-09-25) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Feedback > VIC20, +4, C16 and so on
2007-02-25 21:35
ptoing

Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 271
VIC20, +4, C16 and so on

I think it would be nice to have all Commodore 8 bit machines on the CSDb, it might even generate more demos and stuff for the less common systems.
 
... 188 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2007-02-26 02:59
Codey

Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 79
there's already at least one c128 only demo on here. you would think it's 64 only, or everyone gets a pass.
2007-02-26 07:27
MagerValp

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1065
C128 and DTV are just expanded C64s, so it makes sense to include them. +4 has its own scene database on emucamp. VIC-20 is the only "homeless" platform, but pouet seems to work ok.
2007-02-26 07:35
ready.

Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 441
and besides C128 and DTV releases in CSDB, there's also a C65 release: C65 Demo

But of course all these systems include the C64 inside.
2007-02-26 08:39
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5076
Magervalp, no c128 and dtv are not expanded c64s.

The c128 was designed from scratch and the designer's (Bill Herd's) main goal was to make it as fuckin c64 compatible as possible, you can thank to him the awesome compatibility level, they have tested and tested, and changed the circuits if found one game that did not work.

The DTV is too obvious to go into details.


I have already started a thread some time ago about this and back then the reactions were all positive. Commodore 8 bits could (should) be supported. The c64 scene were so much bigger that a few hundred other platform release wouldnt hurt jut make csdb and us richer.
2007-02-26 10:33
T.M.R
Account closed

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 749
Me, i don't mind either way since i play with just about any 8-bit going; being able to put all of Cosine's VIC, C16/Plus/4 and so on releases here (sorry Scout =-) would be nice an' all, but i do have the Cosine site for that as well.

But the whole "purity" argument is indeed shot full of holes; we have C65 and C128 releases, DTV demos (and although it's modelled on a C64, the architecture of the DTV is totally different and it supports stuff the stock hasn't a hope in hell of doing), C64 with REU demos (of which one is mine), products that require hardware like IDE64 which, lets face it, shifts the goalposts a huge distance and SuperCPU releases that go a step further and run away with the goalposts entirely since they're running on a 16-bit processesor that is merely latched to the C64's video system.

It might say C64 scene database up there, but this site side steps into some very grey and fuzzy areas and when you get C64 people doing demos on other Commodore 8-bit machines and even porting their graphics over, things get fuzzier still.
2007-02-26 11:12
Luca

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 178
Expanding the spectrum (ZOMG! I said "spectrum"!) of CSDb to several other machines would mean to jeopardize (oh well, better to say "rethink") the firm name from the roots.
Ambitious, kewl, large. Not so easy at all, but could be done anyway...
2007-02-26 11:37
ptoing

Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 271
It would still all be Commodore, no?

Also how many c16/116/plus4 demos are there? 1000 perhaps? And vic20 is like a handful. If a few of the active sceners would help the extra info would be added in no time, once perff adds the extra release types and stuff (if he wants to that is)
2007-02-26 11:46
Luca

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 178
Quote: It would still all be Commodore, no?

Also how many c16/116/plus4 demos are there? 1000 perhaps? And vic20 is like a handful. If a few of the active sceners would help the extra info would be added in no time, once perff adds the extra release types and stuff (if he wants to that is)


Yes, +4 demos should be 1400 ca., all-shit-included. And: yes, there would be few categories to be added into (SIDcard, 16K...).
2007-02-26 11:50
Oswald

Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5076
Platform tag & other ideas
2007-02-26 12:12
jailbird

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1576
Even though I'm a huge fan of every scene platform, especially those related to Commodore, I have always opposed the idea of extending CSDb with anything that has no strong connection to C64. C128 and DTV have much closer communion to C64 than the machines mentioned in the topic title. Let's not put here every engine just for the sake of the "Commodore" prefix...

The database is already quite bloated, hard to navigate, full of usability glitches so I'd rather like to see more improvements done on the layout (or on fixes and updates some of us proposed), rather than filling it up with several thousands of releases which have absolutely nothing to do with C64.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 20 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Knight Rider/TREX
icon/The Silents, Sp..
Sychamis
Grue/Extend
kbs/Pht/Lxt
CA$H/TRiAD
macx
goerp/F4CG/HF
HCL/Booze Design
leonofsgr/Singular C..
lft
MaD ][/Starship
celticdesign/G★P/M..
Berluskåni/The Gump..
dstar/Fairlight
Alakran_64
Guests online: 131
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 Mojo  (9.6)
6 Uncensored  (9.6)
7 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
8 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
9 No Bounds  (9.6)
10 Unboxed  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
6 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
7 Morph  (9.5)
8 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
9 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
10 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Booze Design  (9.3)
2 Oxyron  (9.3)
3 Nostalgia  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.2)
Top Diskmag Editors
1 Magic  (9.8)
2 Jazzcat  (9.5)
3 hedning  (9.4)
4 Elwix  (9.1)
5 Remix  (9.1)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.048 sec.