| |
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829 |
Cracks and Crack Intros in CSDb
Seems most people agreed not to add commercial games into the scene database, well after all, the project's name is SCENE database, therefore it's only logical. Delete them. If you want to add games into a database support Gamebase 64 or UVL or any other.
Twoflower states he won't add cracks to the Triad entry for the reason of its length. This isn't a reason to exclude them, but a job for the database coders to split up the chronological group release list into demos and cracks.
Of course cracks are part of the scene and i even add the job of doing a crack intro to the demo scene work. Problem occures crack intros aren't released as stand-alones but only in conjunction with cracks. It's wrong to say Remember released their Satan intro in 1997, ignoring it was linked onto a crack.
Cons? |
|
... 12 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Slator
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 274 |
maybe there should be some "extra" startscreen/GUI for crack oriented content or maybe a checkbox in the profile where you have something like wanna see crack releases y/n.
It makes no sense in splitting up the scene into demo/crack as it is impossible to seperate them, they are like siamese twins with one heart, the c64.
maybe a special marker for cracks should be established, so that those who dont want to see it, can just turn it off.
hmm, hope it aint too hard to get what I want to say..
|
| |
T.M.R
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 749 |
Okay, 'nother pain-in-the-arse idea, how about if a list on a group's page gets over a certain length, any cracks get filed off onto a separate page...? |
| |
Stryyker
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 468 |
I always think of CSDB as a legal scene based database. Maybe someone should work with CSDB crew for a compatible database format for illegal scene which can have your links to games. This could all be in the same database if the servers could handle it. Then we could use different front ends, legal, illegal or combined. We could server all people. Maybe someone should talk to the games based databases to discuss a few issues and maybe crosslink? |
| |
Seven
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 202 |
talking about legal/illegal... adding links for files of possibly illegal content (read: cracks) should be disabled right away.. different countries may have different laws about this, but in some countries the webmaster is actually held responsible for stuff his site links to...
we wouldn't want some company to discover that there's a link or two to cracked versions of their property (even if it is 10+ years old) and sue the database away, would we? |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11384 |
sorry se7en, but thats ridiculous :o) there are ways to prevent any company from beeing able to even remotely figuring out who is behind a certain website, server or content. (just for the sake of it, give it a try and track down hitmen-console.org owner :o)). also in the case of c64 stuff, even IF some company tracks down the responsible person, it would ask the one to put down certain links or context before sueing them. moreover, the simple fact that most companies did not care for their property to be spread around the net in public for +10years makes all and any attempt from their side to suddenly sue ppl void. (most civilised countries have that kinda laws atleast).
for that matter, i personally find it much more dangerous how this (and other) websites and databases exhibit certain personal data connected to sceners handles.... most dont care, but those who are still active not only in the demoscene probably wont appreciate it. (eg some magic dwarf keeps adding back my birthday to the database everytime i delete it... WTF?) |
| |
Steppe
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 1510 |
LOL!!!
Why don't you simply lock your entry? |
| |
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829 |
CSDb might get sued by German lawyers for providing 18+ games all over. Hehehehe.
Due to brain-damaged text content of the new youth law all computer games pre 1994 have, taken the law exactly by its words, become 18+.
And, yes... shuriken are forbidden, no more Last Ninja playing in your backyard. |
| |
Seven
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 202 |
@groepaz:
1) A company MIGHT ask you to take whatever content down, but it doesn't HAVE to... if they want to sue you right away, they will
2) I'd like to see that law you're referring to
3) no matter how much that particular registrar violates standards, they'll just approach the server owner anyway, who will be more than happy to point the law enforcement into the right direction if otherwise it will be his head on the plate
4) I suppose you're pretty much aware of the fact that there's the so-called "Abmahnung" in Germany, which can cost you unnecessary money even without a court procedure... and linking to a site with content of illegal nature had its precedents...
5) I agree that publishing personal information about other sceners without their consent is a dangerous thing
either way... my posting was not about what you can get away with, but about what would be the right thing to do |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11384 |
@groepaz:
1) A company MIGHT ask you to take whatever content down, but it doesn't HAVE to... if they want to sue you right away, they will
sure... however the biggest problem is not loosing the case, but paying your own lawyer in advance :=P
BUT i can tell from first hand, that companies like the big N, Sony and Sega *will* send you a mail and ask you to put the stuff down :) oh, firststar software will do that to :)
2) I'd like to see that law you're referring to
been a while since i have been reading copyright law, but theres a sentence that basically says that if you "never" tried to enforce your rights, you will loose that right alltogether after "a long time". (gummiparagraphenfreund :=P). its along the same lines that say that "irrelevant" or "exremely low standard" pieces of code are not protected by copyright. (you can not say "hey all jmp $fce2 are mine" :=))
3) no matter how much that particular registrar violates standards, they'll just approach the server owner anyway, who will be more than happy to point the law enforcement into the right direction if otherwise it will be his head on the plate
a) domain owner != site owner
b) server owner dont know who is site owner
[this is not possible with server in germany, admitted :=)]
4) I suppose you're pretty much aware of the fact that there's the so-called "Abmahnung" in Germany, which can cost you unnecessary money even without a court procedure... and linking to a site with content of illegal nature had its precedents...
c) server not in germoney :o)
d) domain owner not in germoney :)
either way... my posting was not about what you can get away with, but about what would be the right thing to do
but only the first is of real interest :=P
afterall, the only "illegal content" that is currently even remotely dangerous to put on the web is directly linked mp3 and movies....and least dangerous are probably those games from the 80s, which are more like *theoretically* copyrighted, but practically public-domain since a decade.
anyway... back to topic :=P |
| |
Seven
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 202 |
to 1) that's nice of 'em, but unfortunately you cannot count on that with all companies
to 2) that's §102 Urhg (old version, don't have the new version from April 1st 2003 yet), but it's about not enforcing the rights in a single case within 3 years of knowledge of that particular violation... won't really save anyone at this point, except maybe some old ftp servers
to 3+4) may be true for some sites, but it still poses the same problem for those site owners that do _not_ hide, making it kind of illegal to link to a crack-linking CSDb, which would be a shame IMO
so I still propose to not link to cracked and other potentially illegal files |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next |
